Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2001International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Development of a quality assessment instrument for trials of treatments for depression and neurosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JMJoanna MoncrieffNorth East London NHS Foundation TrustRCRachel ChurchillKleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)CDColin DrummondCentre for Addiction and Mental Health

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Moncrieff et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a110d0248dd349bb9168541https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.108
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology: Table 11996 · 162 citations
  2. 2Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trials1983 · 873 citations
  3. 3The quality of alcohol treatment research: an examination of influential controlled trials and development of a quality rating system1998 · 27 citations
  4. 4Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials1996 · 3,167 citations
  5. 5Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials1995 · 5,575 citations