Key result
Increasing or persistently high C-reactive protein levels were associated with a significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.10-3.06).
Why the study?
Do baseline and serial changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predict cardiovascular events in high cardiovascular risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=616)
Do baseline and serial changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predict cardiovascular events in high cardiovascular risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: HR 1.84 (95% CI 1.10-3.06)
Baseline and serial changes in CRP levels provide cardiovascular risk prediction independent of standard risk factors and glycemic control in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) is controversial in type 2 diabetes mellitus. We aimed to assess it in a cohort of high cardiovascular risk diabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: CRP was measured at baseline and during the second year of follow-up in 616 patients. The primary end points were a composite of total fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (CVEs), major CVEs, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. Association between baseline and second-year CRP with end points were evaluated by multivariable Cox survival analyses. Baseline median CRP was 2.8 mg/L (interquartile range: 1.2-6.0 mg/L), and 47.8% of the patients either increased or persisted with high CRP levels during the first 2 years of follow-up. After a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 131 total CVEs occurred (89 major CVEs), and 129 patients died (53 of cardiovascular causes). Baseline and second-year CRP, analyzed as a continuous variable and dichotomized at >3.0 mg/L, were significantly associated with total and major CVEs occurrence (with adjusted hazard ratios between 1.22 and 1.34 for increments of 1-SD log of continuous CRP, and between 1.47 and 1.89 for dichotomized CRP), but not with mortality. Additionally, increasing CRP levels or persisting with high levels were associated with a 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.06) excess risk of major CVEs, independent of baseline CRP values. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline and serial changes in CRP levels provide cardiovascular risk prediction independent of standard risk factors and glycemic control, and may be useful to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardoso et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=616). C-reactive protein (CRP) levels was evaluated on Composite of total fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (CVEs), major CVEs, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.10-3.06). Increasing or persistently high C-reactive protein levels were associated with a significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.10-3.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: