Key result
PICU admission VVR score strongly predicts mechanical ventilation or ECMO use in pediatric heart failure.
Why the study?
The vasoactive-ventilation-renal score predicts outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery, but whether it predicts pediatric intensive care unit length of stay in children with heart failure was unknown.
Does the VVR score on admission predict prolonged PICU length of stay in pediatric heart failure patients?
Cohort (n=96)
Does the VVR score on admission predict prolonged PICU length of stay in pediatric heart failure patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.823
p-value: p=<0.001
The VVR score on admission is a useful predictor of prolonged PICU length of stay and the need for mechanical ventilation or ECMO in pediatric heart failure patients.
VVR score may aid early risk stratification in pediatric HF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: The vasoactive-ventilation-renal (VVR) score is a disease severity index for predicting outcomes of pediatric patients receiving cardiac surgeries. We investigated whether the VVR score on admission can predict the length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in children diagnosed with heart failure (HF). Methods: Medical records were reviewed for pediatric HF cases between January 2010 and December 2016. We calculated the VVR score using the electronic data, including measurements obtained at the time of admission and analyzed the correlation between the VVR score and prolonged LOS (PLOS). A PLOS was defined by a longer stay than the median duration for the surviving cases. Results: A total of 113 pediatric HF cases were reviewed, of which 96 cases were finally included in the study. The median [IQR] LOS was 12 [6, 22] days. The use of a mechanical ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were associated with PLOS. The area under the curve (AUC) of the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), VVR score, lactic acid level, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) for evaluating the association with mechanical ventilator or ECMO use was 0.682 (P = 0.006), 0.823 (P < 0.001), 0.683 (P = 0.006), and 0.783 (P < 0.001), respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the VVR score was the only significant parameter for predicting PLOS. Conclusions: The VVR score on admission to the PICU is predictive for mechanical ventilator or ECMO use, which correlates with a PLOS. Therefore, the VVR score at PICU admission in children with HF is a useful LOS marker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Pediatric heart failure (n=96). Vasoactive-ventilation-renal (VVR) score vs. Vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), lactic acid level, and BNP was evaluated on Association with mechanical ventilator or ECMO use and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) (AUC 0.823, p=<0.001). The VVR score on admission to the PICU significantly predicted mechanical ventilator or ECMO use (AUC 0.823, P<0.001), which correlated with prolonged length of stay in children with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: