Why the study?
Does a computerized model for quantitative analysis of left ventricular wall motion from 2-D echocardiograms compare favorably to qualitative analysis by an experienced cardiologist in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does a computerized model for quantitative analysis of left ventricular wall motion from 2-D echocardiograms compare favorably to qualitative analysis by an experienced cardiologist in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Computerized LV wall motion quantification was tested versus experts in an RCT but lacks reported metrics; leaves open its standardization potential in post-MI care.
Two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) imaging is a more attractive clinical tool than other modalities that either involve radiation exposure or are too slow to image heart motion in real-time. Computer-aided analysis of left ventricular(LV) wall motion provides quantitative parameters for diagnosis. This study presents a computerized model for quantitative analysis of left ventricular wall motion from two-dimensional echocardiography by the application of image processing algorithms, including automatic threshold estimation, contrast stretching, boundary detection and border smoothing. The wall motion measurements rely primarily on sequential changes from end-diastolic to end-systolic frames in the left ventricular contours of apical four-chamber view echocardiograms. Left ventricular wall motion was analyzed on the 30 segments of 5 patients with acute myocardial infarction. The results from the computerized model were compared to those obtained from qualitative analysis of echocardiograms by an experienced clinical cardiologist who was unaware of the results of quantitative data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: