Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using centuries of Nile flood data, I document that during deviant Nile floods, Egypt's highest-ranking religious authority was less likely to be replaced and relative allocations to religious structures increased. These findings are consistent with historical evidence that Nile shocks increased this authority's political influence by raising the probability he could coordinate a revolt. I find that the available data provide support for this interpretation and weigh against some of the most plausible alternatives. For example, I show that while Nile shocks increased historical references to social unrest, deviant floods did not increase a proxy for popular religiosity. Together, the results suggest an increase in the political power of religious leaders during periods of economic downturn. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Éric Chaney (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: