This study investigated the impact of formal social support systems on refugees' access to socio-economic rights in Rhinocamp and Imvepi refugee settlements in Uganda. The study was guided by three primary objectives: (i) to assess the level of formal support available to refugees in the two settlements; (ii) to evaluate the level of access refugees have to socio-economic rights; and (iii) to examine the relationship between formal social support systems and access to these rights. A triangulation convergence mixed methods design was employed, combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches. A sample of 400 refugees was drawn from a total refugee population of 220,331 using Slovin’s formula. Data collection methods included structured surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observations. The findings revealed a robust formal support system with a mean score of 4.0 and a high level of access to socio-economic rights, with a mean score of 3.7. Furthermore, the study found a statistically significant positive relationship between the presence of formal support systems and refugees’ access to socio-economic rights. This study adds to the new empirical evidence from two major refugee settlements undergoing a transition from humanitarian relief to long-term development. The study uniquely underscored the shifting focus in academic discourse from informal to formal support mechanisms and linking them directly to socio-economic rights. The results have practical implications for policymakers, development actors, and humanitarian agencies, highlighting the need for context-specific, well-structured formal support systems to promote balanced access to socioeconomic rights for refugees.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: