Key result
Application of aggressive evidence-based medication protocols significantly reduced the composite rate of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and coronary interventions from 29.1% to 9.2%.
Why the study?
Does the application of aggressive evidence-based medication protocols reduce the composite of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and coronary interventions in patients with coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=357)
No
Does the application of aggressive evidence-based medication protocols reduce the composite of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and coronary interventions in patients with coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.2% vs 29.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Implementation of aggressive evidence-based medication protocols in a community cardiology practice was associated with a significant reduction in atherosclerotic events and the need for coronary interventions.
May support protocol use in community CAD care; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of causality.
INTRODUCTION: Although atherosclerotic disease cannot be cured, risk of recurrent events can be reduced by application of evidence-based treatment protocols involving aspirin, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and statin medications. We studied atherosclerotic event rates in a patient population treated before and after the development of aggressive risk factor reduction treatment protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting for follow-up treatment of coronary artery disease in a community cardiology practice, comparing atherosclerotic event rates and medication usage in a 2-year treatment period prior to 2002 and a 2-year period in 2005-2008. Care was provided in both the early and later eras by 7 board-certified cardiologists in a suburban cardiology practice. Medication usage was compared in both treatment eras. The primary outcome was a composite event rate of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and coronary interventions. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven patients were studied, with a follow-up duration of 12.1 (±3.5) years. There were 132 composite events in 104 patients (29.1%) in the early era compared to 40 events in 33 patients (9.2%) in the later era (p < 0.0001). From the early to the later eras, there was an increase in use of β-blockers (66% to 83%, p < 0.0001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (34% to 80%, p < 0.0001), and statins (40% to 90%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of aggressive evidence-based medication protocols for treatment of atherosclerosis is associated with a significant decrease in atherosclerotic events or need for coronary intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mercando et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=357). Aggressive evidence-based medication protocols (later era) vs. Early era treatment (prior to 2002) was evaluated on Composite of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and coronary interventions (p=<0.0001). Application of aggressive evidence-based medication protocols significantly reduced the composite rate of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and coronary interventions from 29.1% to 9.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: