Key result
AI-enabled ECG outperforms cardiologists in detecting LVH, which is linked to ~91% higher CV mortality.
Why the study?
Concealed LVH carries a substantial risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, especially in young to middle-aged adults, warranting early identification.
Does an AI-enabled model using 12-lead ECGs improve the early detection of left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality prediction compared to conventional ECG criteria in young to middle-aged adults?
Observational (n=28,745)
Yes
Does an AI-enabled model using 12-lead ECGs improve the early detection of left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality prediction compared to conventional ECG criteria in young to middle-aged adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An AI-enabled ECG model significantly improves the early detection of left ventricular hypertrophy and provides independent prognostic value for long-term mortality in young to middle-aged adults.
BACKGROUND: Concealed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a prevalent condition that is correlated with a substantial risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, especially in young to middle-aged adults. Early identification of LVH is warranted. In this work, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled model for early detection and risk stratification of LVH using 12-lead ECGs. METHODS: By deep learning techniques on the ECG recordings from 28 745 patients (20-60 years old), the AI model was developed to detect verified LVH from transthoracic echocardiography and evaluated on an independent cohort. Two hundred twenty-five patients from Japan were externally validated. Cardiologists' diagnosis of LVH was based on conventional ECG criteria. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were applied to evaluate the model performance. A Cox regression model estimated the independent effects of AI-predicted LVH on cardiovascular or all-cause death. RESULTS: The AUC of the AI model in diagnosing LVH was 0.89 (sensitivity: 90.3%, specificity: 69.3%), which was significantly better than that of the cardiologists' diagnosis (AUC, 0.64). In the second independent cohort, the diagnostic performance of the AI model was consistent (AUC, 0.86; sensitivity: 85.4%, specificity: 67.0%). After a follow-up of 6 years, AI-predicted LVH was independently associated with higher cardiovascular or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.91 [1.04-3.49] and 1.54 [1.20-1.97], respectively). The predictive power of the AI model for mortality was consistently valid among patients of different ages, sexes, and comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Last, we also validated the model in the international independent cohort from Japan (AUC, 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The AI model improved the detection of LVH and mortality prediction in the young to middle-aged population and represented an attractive tool for risk stratification. Early identification by the AI model gives every chance for timely treatment to reverse adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=28,745). Artificial intelligence-enabled model using 12-lead ECGs vs. Cardiologists' diagnosis based on conventional ECG criteria was evaluated on Diagnosis of LVH (Area under the curve). An AI-enabled 12-lead ECG model detected left ventricular hypertrophy better than cardiologists (AUC 0.89 vs 0.64), and AI-predicted LVH was associated with higher cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.91).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: