Key result
Angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers (ARBs) offer better tolerance than ACE inhibitors, but their clinical effectiveness remains to be established by ongoing randomized clinical trials.
Why the study?
Do ARBs improve clinical outcomes and offer better tolerance compared to ACE inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Do ARBs improve clinical outcomes and offer better tolerance compared to ACE inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
This review outlines the theoretical advantages of ARBs over ACE inhibitors and highlights the need for ongoing RCTs to establish their clinical effectiveness in cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ARBs may suit ACE-intolerant patients for tolerability; leaves open equivalence on cardiovascular outcomes until RCTs conclude.
JRAAS 2001;2:215-18 Based on multiple, well-conducted, randomised clinical outcome trials (RCT), inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) has become a firmly established therapeutic approach for reducing morbidity and the risk of death across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases (Figure 1). More recently, another pharmacologic class of agents that inhibits the RAS has become clinically available.Angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT1)-receptor blockers (ARBs) offer a more complete and specific way of inhibiting the actions of Ang II at the AT1-receptor. Unlike ACEI, ARBs do not directly interfere with the breakdown of bradykinin. When introduced, ARBs promised more complete inhibition of the RAS with greater efficacy and better tolerance than ACE-I. Although the better tolerance comparison appears to have been substantiated, the more important issue of clinical effectiveness of ARBs remains unsettled. We are fortunately in the midst of an impressive series of RCTs, which collectively will evaluate and quantitate the role of ARBs in clinical practice. Based on the ACE-I experience,we provide a framework to consider the completed and ongoing clinical outcomes RCTs with ARBs (Figure 2).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skali et al. (2001) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers (ARBs) vs. ACE inhibitors was evaluated. Angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers (ARBs) offer better tolerance than ACE inhibitors, but their clinical effectiveness remains to be established by ongoing randomized clinical trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: