Key result
Hypertension in young adults is linked to adverse CV outcomes later in life.
Why the study?
Young adults have seen a slower decline in CVD mortality alongside rising hypertension prevalence, yet awareness and control remain low, and the long-term impact of young adult blood pressure is often underappreciated.
This review highlights the impact of high blood pressure during young adulthood (18-39 years) on later-life cardiovascular disease risk and the need for improved awareness and management.
Should not yet change practice in young adults; leaves open whether early intervention improves long-term outcomes.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has declined markedly over the past several decades among middle-age and older adults in the United States. However, young adults (18-39 years of age) have had a lower rate of decline in CVD mortality. This trend may be related to the prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) having increased among young US adults. Additionally, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension are low among US adults between 20 and 39 years of age. Many young adults and healthcare providers may not be aware of the impact of high BP during young adulthood on their later life, the associations of BP patterns with adverse outcomes later in life, and benefit-to-harm ratios of pharmacological treatment. This review provides a synthesis of the related resources available in the literature to better understand BP-related CVD risk among young adults and better identify BP patterns and levels during young adulthood that are associated with CVD events later in life, and lastly, to clarify future challenges in BP management for young adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuichiro Yano (2021) conducted a review in High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. High blood pressure in young adults (18-39 years of age) is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes later in life, highlighting the need for improved awareness, treatment, and control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: