Key result
Current use of standard doses of oral estrogen in postmenopausal women was associated with a 60% reduced odds of severe coronary artery calcification (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.82).
Why the study?
Does hormone therapy reduce severe coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic postmenopausal women?
Observational (n=204)
Does hormone therapy reduce severe coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic postmenopausal women?
Effect estimate: OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.19-0.82)
Current hormone therapy use in asymptomatic postmenopausal women is associated with a 60% reduced odds of severe coronary atherosclerosis as measured by coronary artery calcification.
In Brief Objective: To determine (1) whether past or current hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women is associated with subclinical coronary artery plaque burden, (2) whether any association is independent of age, body size, blood pressure, lipids, fasting plasma glucose, cigarette smoking, leisure time physical activity, alcohol intake, use of lipid-lowering medications, and socioeconomic status, and (3) whether any association varies by duration of HT or by the use of combined versus unopposed HT. Design: An observational study, with HT validated and coronary heart disease risk factors determined between 1997 and 1999 in a research clinic, and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) evaluated by electron beam computed tomography in 2001 through 2002. Participants were 204 community-dwelling postmenopausal women from the Rancho Bernardo cohort aged 55 to 78 years with no history of heart disease. Results: The odds of severe CACS in current estrogen users (n = 127) was 0.40 (95% CI 0.19, 0.82), controlling for all covariates. Past users (n = 40) had intermediate odds (multiply adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.28, 1.58). In subgroup analyses, age-adjusted associations did not differ between the 68 women using unopposed estrogen versus the 59 using an estrogen-progestin regimen. Women who had used HT for at least 10 years (n = 86) had significantly less (P = 0.01) plaque burden than shorter term users (n = 41). Conclusions: Both the strong association and the duration of use effect independent of lifestyle and social class suggest an antiatherogenic effect of postmenopausal estrogen. Only a clinical trial can completely exclude confounding by social class, lifestyle, and unmeasured covariates. In this observational study, postmenopausal women currently using standard doses of oral estrogen had a 60% reduced odds of severe coronary atherosclerosis, as estimated from coronary artery calcification. This association was independent of socioeconomic status, lifestyle, and biological heart disease risk factors; it was greater with longer use and was similar with estrogen alone or when used with a progestin. These results point to the need for clinical trials in which coronary atherosclerosis, not cardiac events, is the primary outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrett‐Connor et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Postmenopausal women with no history of heart disease (n=204). Hormone therapy (HT) vs. Past or never use of hormone therapy was evaluated on Severe coronary artery calcium score (CACS) (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.82). Current use of standard doses of oral estrogen in postmenopausal women was associated with a 60% reduced odds of severe coronary artery calcification (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: