Key result
Nurse-led self-care substantially improves quality of life, anxiety, and symptom burden in HF.
Why the study?
Research evidence regarding the effects of nurse-led heart failure self-care interventions on patient outcomes is scant.
Do nurse-led self-care interventions improve health outcomes such as quality of life, anxiety, and symptom burden in people with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,746)
Do nurse-led self-care interventions improve health outcomes such as quality of life, anxiety, and symptom burden in people with heart failure?
Effect estimate: SMD 0.83 (95% CI 0.50-1.15)
Nurse-led self-care interventions significantly improve quality of life, anxiety, and symptom burden in patients with heart failure, though effects on readmissions and mortality remain unclear.
Supports integration of nurse-led self-care into heart failure care; confirms moderate-quality evidence for quality-of-life and symptom gains.
AIM: To estimate the effects of nurse-led self-care interventions on people with heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Research evidence of the effects of nurse-led HF self-care interventions on patient outcomes is scant. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched from the inception to December 2022 to identify eligible studies. METHODS: RCTs published in English that evaluated the impact of nurse-led HF self-care interventions on quality of life, anxiety, symptom burden, sleep quality, healthcare service utilisation and mortality were included. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using RoB 2.0. We conducted data syntheses using the R software and graded the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with 2746 subjects were included. Our findings demonstrated, that compared to the controls, nurse-led self-care interventions improved QOL (SMD: .83, 95% CI: .50-1.15, moderate evidence), anxiety (MD: 1.39, 95% CI: .49-2.29, high evidence) and symptom burden (SMD: .81, 95% CI: .24-1.38, low evidence) in people with HF. No significant effects were found in all-cause hospital readmission and all-cause emergency department visit. Research evidence on sleep quality, cardiac-related hospital readmission, cardiac-related emergency department visit and all-cause mortality remained unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that nurse-led HF self-care interventions have favourable effects on the QOL, anxiety and symptom burden. Further, well-designed RCTs are warranted to address the gaps identified in this review. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results indicated that nurse-led HF self-care interventions could improve QOL, anxiety and symptom burden in people with HF. Nurse-led self-care intervention could be integrated into current HF management practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in heart failure (n=2,746). nurse-led self-care interventions vs. controls was evaluated on quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.83, 95% CI 0.50-1.15). Nurse-led self-care interventions improved quality of life (SMD 0.83; 95% CI 0.50-1.15), anxiety, and symptom burden in patients with heart failure compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: