Key result
Cardiac pacing with an ICD in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and QRS >150 ms was associated with higher survival compared to no pacing.
Why the study?
Does cardiac pacing with an ICD improve survival in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and a QRS width > 150 ms?
Cohort (n=989)
No
Does cardiac pacing with an ICD improve survival in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and a QRS width > 150 ms?
In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and a prolonged QRS interval (>150 ms), cardiac pacing with an ICD is associated with significantly improved survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ICD pacing decisions in wide-QRS cardiomyopathy; leaves open causal benefit pending RCTs.
Aim: The main objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between prolonged QRS interval and its prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to determine the effects of cardiac pacing with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) on mortality in patients with a QRS width > 150 ms. Methods: We retrospectively queried the healthcare enterprise data warehouse and the patient medical records from January 2007 to December 2012 for 1453 cases of DCM at a university- affiliated hospital. Of the 1453 cases, 989 patients were included in the final analyses. Primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality. Results: Of the 989 patients, 20% ( n = 198) of the patients had a QRS width > 150 ms. Compared with patients who had a QRS < 120 ms, patients with a QRS > 150 ms had significantly higher rates of death ( p < 0.001). Among the subgroup of 198 patients who had a QRS width > 150 ms, survival (84.3%, n = 75) was significantly higher ( p < 0.001) in patients with a pacemaker inserted compared with those (45.0%, n = 49) who had not been paced. Conclusions: Prolonged QRS interval is significantly associated with a higher rate of mortality. However, we believe that cardiac pacing with an ICD in such patients can significantly improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shuaib et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=989). Cardiac pacing with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vs. No pacing was evaluated on All-cause mortality (reported as survival) (p=<0.001). Cardiac pacing with an ICD in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and QRS >150 ms was associated with higher survival compared to no pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: