Literature review uncovers systemic metabolic and proteolytic drivers of muscle atrophy in KRAS-mutant pancreatic cancer, highlighting key targets for treating cancer-induced cachexia.
Background and Objective: Cachexia-induced skeletal muscle atrophy is a critical manifestation in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS)-mutant pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, predominantly characterized by a shift in metabolic equilibrium towards catabolism that accelerates protein degradation in myofibers and leads to muscle atrophy. This metabolic reprogramming not only supports tumor growth but also precipitates energy depletion in skeletal muscle tissues. Exploring these mechanisms reveals potential therapeutic targets in the metabolic and proteolytic pathways associated with KRAS-mutant PC. Methods: , 2024. Studies on PC models and patients were included. Key Content and Findings: The crosstalk between KRAS-mutant PC and skeletal muscle atrophy can be categorized into four principal domains: (I) KRAS-driven metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells leads to the depletion of muscle energy reserves, thereby influencing the reallocation of myofiber energy towards fueling cancer cell; (II) KRAS-mutant cancer cells rely on nutrient-scavenging pathways, resulting in altered cytokine profiles, increased ubiquitin mRNA expression and autophagy-lysosome pathway, which facilitate myotube degradation and inhibit muscle regeneration, thereby disrupting muscular homeostasis and causing a one-way nutrient flux; (III) tumor-induced oxidative stress inflicts damage on myotubes, highlighting the detrimental effects of reactive oxygen species on muscle structure; (IV) KRAS-mutant cancer cells remodulate immune cell dynamics within the tumor environment, thereby reshaping host immunity. Together, these findings illuminate the intricate interplay between KRAS-mutant PC and skeletal muscle atrophy, mapping the pathophysiological framework that is crucial for understanding sarcopenia and related disorders. Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis advances our understanding of the complex etiology of cancer cachexia and stimulates the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: