Key result
High-density mapping with the HDMM basket catheter identified pulmonary vein potentials in more quadrants than the standard AC catheter.
Why the study?
Does high-density mapping with a 32-pole basket catheter (HDMM) improve the detection of pulmonary vein potentials compared to an 8-pole spiral catheter (AC) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cryoballoon ablation?
Observational (n=24)
Does high-density mapping with a 32-pole basket catheter (HDMM) improve the detection of pulmonary vein potentials compared to an 8-pole spiral catheter (AC) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cryoballoon ablation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-density mapping with a 32-pole basket catheter detects significantly more pulmonary vein potentials than a standard 8-pole spiral catheter during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Background The dominant single‐shot procedure for Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) is the Cryoballoon Ablation (CBA) technique using a spiral catheter (Achieve™, AC) for mapping and monitoring purposes. We hypothesized that Basket Catheters, such as the High Density Mesh Mapper (HDMM), with its high‐density mapping properties, could detect Pulmonary Vein Potentials (PVPs) that the octapolar AC would not be able to identify. Methods Twenty‐four patients (average age 61.8±10 years) with either paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (Paroxysmal AF or Persistent AF) were enrolled in the study. While the patients were in sinus rhythm, all pulmonary veins (PVs) were prospectively mapped both prior and subsequent to CBA with a 32‐pole HDMM and an 8‐pole AC. PVPs were recorded using both catheters, and their location was allocated to one of four PV quadrants. Then, the quadrant findings of the mapping catheters were compared. Results Mapping using the HDMM allowed for more precise identification of PVPs both before and after CBA compared to AC mapping. We identified an average of 83.6±4.8 PVPs in all four PVs (this means 20.9±10.5 PVPs /per single PV per patient [HDMM], 14.5±1.3 PVPs/in all four PVs and 3.6±2.7 PVPs /per single PV per patient [AC]) before ablation, thereby leading to a significant difference in the identification of PVPs per PV quadrant. Of 384 PV quadrants/24 patients analyzed, the HDMM identified PVPs in 279 and AC in only 192 quadrants ( P <0.05). Conclusion High‐density mapping with a Basket Catheter, such as the HDMM, detects PVPs that remain undetected when using the standard AC catheter in CBA procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meißner et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=24). High Density Mesh Mapper (HDMM) basket catheter vs. Achieve (AC) spiral catheter was evaluated on Identification of pulmonary vein potentials (PVPs) per PV quadrant (p=<0.05). High-density mapping with the HDMM basket catheter identified pulmonary vein potentials in more quadrants than the standard AC catheter.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: