Key result
Routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction during catheter ablation for persistent AF improved single-procedure freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia (65% vs 40%, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction improve freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=161)
Does routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction improve freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 65% vs 40%
p-value: p=<0.01
Routine adenosine challenge to identify and ablate dormant posterior wall conduction significantly improves long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmias in patients with persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May support adenosine challenge in persistent AF ablation; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
McLellan et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=161). Routine adenosine challenge vs. No adenosine challenge was evaluated on Single procedure freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia (p=<0.01). Routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction during catheter ablation for persistent AF improved single-procedure freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia (65% vs 40%, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: