Key result
Renin-angiotensin system blockade significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 39.1% (HR 0.609) compared with non-use in hypertensive patients with proteinuria.
Why the study?
Although RAS blockade is recommended for hypertensive patients with proteinuria, its effect on Korean hypertensive patients had not been investigated.
Does renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade reduce mortality and end-stage renal disease in Korean hypertensive patients with proteinuria?
Cohort (n=8,460)
Does renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade reduce mortality and end-stage renal disease in Korean hypertensive patients with proteinuria?
RAS blockade is associated with significantly reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Korean hypertensive patients with proteinuria, supporting guideline recommendations for its use in this population.
RAS blockade was associated with lower mortality in this cohort; extends observational support for guidelines but leaves causal benefit open.
BACKGROUND: Although renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade is recommended for hypertensive patients with proteinuria, the effect of RAS blockade on Korean hypertensive patients has not been investigated. METHODS: Among individuals who underwent a National Health Examination between 2002 and 2003 in Korea, hypertensive patients with proteinuria (defined as a dipstick test result ≥2+) were enrolled in this study. We investigated the outcomes of two groups stratified by RAS blockade prescription (with RAS blockade vs. without RAS blockade). Moreover, Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to examine the effects of RAS blockade on mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). RESULTS: A total of 8,460 patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 6,236 (73.7%) were prescribed with RAS blockade. The mean follow-up period was 129 months. A total of 1,003 (11.9%) patients died, of whom 273 (3.2%) died of cardiovascular (CV) events. The Kaplan-Meier curves for all-cause or CV mortality showed that the survival probability was significantly higher in the RAS blockade group than in the non-RAS blockade group. Multivariate Cox analysis also revealed RAS blockade significantly reduced the all-cause and CV mortality rates by 39.1% and 33.7%, respectively, compared with non-RAS blockade, even after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbid diseases; however, ESRD was not affected. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that RAS blockade was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality but not in the incidence of ESRD. However, 26.3% of the enrolled patients did not use RAS blockade. Physicians need to consider the usefulness of RAS blockade in hypertensive patients with proteinuria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Hypertension with proteinuria (n=8,460). Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade vs. Non-RAS blockade was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.609, 95% CI 0.534-0.693, p=<0.001). Renin-angiotensin system blockade significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 39.1% (HR 0.609) compared with non-use in hypertensive patients with proteinuria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: