Key result
In Korean patients with ESRD, cumulative use of RAAS blockade for >90 days was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.35-0.58; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade reduce mortality and major cardiovascular events in Korean patients with end-stage renal disease?
Cohort (n=5,223)
Yes
Does renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade reduce mortality and major cardiovascular events in Korean patients with end-stage renal disease?
In Korean patients with ESRD, RAAS blockade use for >90 days is associated with significantly improved overall survival and major cardiovascular event-free survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support RAAS blockade consideration in ESRD; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Introduction Conflicting results still exist regarding the benefit of renin−angiotensin−aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on clinical outcomes in dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of RAAS blockade on survival in Korean patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods Our analysis was based on the data of 5223 patients enrolled from the Clinical Research Center for ESRD, a nationwide prospective observational cohort. Multivariate Cox regression was applied for risk factor analysis with the cumulative duration of RAAS blockade use as time-varying covariate. The risks for mortality from all causes and major cardiovascular event−free survival were estimated. Results Compared to the control group, patients in the RAAS group were younger but had a higher proportion of diabetes mellitus, had higher systolic blood pressure, required a greater number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs, and had a longer dialysis duration. On multivariate time-varying Cox regression analysis, the RAAS group with cumulative duration of >90 days was significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality from all causes after adjustment for confounding (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35–0.58, P < 0.0001). Major cardiovascular event−free survival was also better for the RAAS group than for the control group on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.20–0.37, P < 0.0001), considering the cumulative duration of RAAS blockade use. Conclusion In Korean patients with ESRD, we reported a specific benefit of RAAS blockade in improving overall survival after adjustment for confounding factors from real-world data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n=5,223). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade vs. Control group was evaluated on Mortality from all causes (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, p=< 0.0001). In Korean patients with ESRD, cumulative use of RAAS blockade for >90 days was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.35-0.58; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: