Key result
IABP in cardiogenic shock is linked to ~47% lower in-hospital mortality across all SCAI stages.
Why the study?
Randomized trials of IABP in cardiogenic shock have included only ACS patients without stratifying by shock severity.
Does intra-aortic balloon pump reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock across different SCAI shock stages?
Observational (n=934)
Does intra-aortic balloon pump reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock across different SCAI shock stages?
In a retrospective cohort of cardiogenic shock patients, IABP use was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality across all SCAI shock stages.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IABP should not yet change practice in cardiogenic shock; leaves open mortality benefit across SCAI stages pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Randomized studies of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in cardiogenic shock (CS) have only included on patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without stratification according to shock severity. We examined the association between IABP and mortality in CS patients across the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stages. METHODS: We included cardiac intensive care unit patients admitted from 2007 to 2015 with CS from any etiology. In-hospital mortality associated with IABP was examined in each SCAI shock stage. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to determine the association between IABP and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included 934 patients, with a mean age of 68 ± 14 years; 60% had ACS. The distribution of SCAI shock stages was: B, 41%; C, 13%; D, 38%; E, 8%. In-hospital mortality was lower in the 39% of patients who received IABP (27% vs. 43%, adjusted OR with IABP after IPTW 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.72, p < .0001). IABP use was associated with lower crude in-hospital mortality in each SCAI shock stage (all p < .05, except p = .08 in SCAI shock stage E). We did not observe any significant heterogeneity in the association between IABP use and in-hospital mortality as a function of SCAI shock stage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CS who were selected to receive an IABP had lower in-hospital mortality, without differences in this effect across the SCAI shock stages. Future studies should account for the severity and etiology of shock when evaluating the efficacy of IABP for CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jentzer et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock (n=934). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) vs. No IABP was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.72, p=<0.0001). Intra-aortic balloon pump use in cardiogenic shock was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (27% vs. 43%; adjusted OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.40-0.72; p<0.0001) across all SCAI shock stages.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: