Why the study?
The role of intra-aortic balloon pump in ACS patients undergoing PCI without cardiogenic shock remains controversial.
Does intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use improve in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI without cardiogenic shock?
Does intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use improve in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI without cardiogenic shock?
IABP use in ACS patients without cardiogenic shock undergoing PCI is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, suggesting careful patient selection is required.
IABP use was associated with higher mortality in ACS-PCI without shock; leaves open whether any subgroup may benefit from randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The role of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without cardiogenic shock remains controversial. AIMS: To assess the association between IABP use and in-hospital mortality in this population and to identify high-risk subgroups. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed data from the CCC-ACS Project. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression were performed to adjust for confounders. Subgroup analyses identified patients groups at greater risk. A supplementary meta-analysis was conducted to reflect existing uncertainty in the broader literature. RESULTS: Among 32,863 ACS patients, 1,127 (3.4%) received IABP. In the propensity-matched cohort, IABP use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.30-5.04, p = 0.006). The risk was more pronounced in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and renal impairment. The meta-analysis of 10 studies showed no significant association between IABP use and mortality (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.79-1.42, p = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: IABP use in ACS patients without cardiogenic shock was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, particularly among high-risk subgroups. Careful patient selection is warranted, and further research is needed to refine its clinical indications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: