Key result
A 6-month controlled lifestyle intervention fails to reduce mean ccIMT versus no intervention.
Why the study?
Common carotid intima-media thickness is an established cardiovascular risk marker, but whether lifestyle interventions can easily demonstrate an improvement in it remains unclear.
Does a 6-month controlled lifestyle intervention improve common carotid intima-media thickness in middle-aged and elderly participants?
Does a 6-month controlled lifestyle intervention improve common carotid intima-media thickness in middle-aged and elderly participants?
A 6-month comprehensive lifestyle intervention may beneficially reduce carotid intima-media thickness in individuals with high baseline values, suggesting a potential role in early cardiovascular disease prevention.
Null overall ccIMT result in this cohort cautions against broad adoption; leaves open targeted effects in high-baseline subgroups.
OBJECTIVES: The intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (ccIMT) is an established risk marker for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, it is unclear whether lifestyle interventions can easily demonstrate an improvement in ccIMT. The objective was to test if our intervention would beneficially affect ccIMT (among other CVD markers). DESIGN: Non-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rural northwest Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Middle-aged and elderly participants from the general population (intervention: n = 114; control: n = 87). INTERVENTION: A community-based, 6-month controlled lifestyle intervention focusing on four areas of lifestyle change: a plant-based diet, physical activity, stress management, and an improved social life. A strong emphasis was on dietary change. MEASUREMENTS: We tested whether ccIMT change from baseline to 6 months was different between groups. RESULTS: With all participants included, no significant difference in mean ccIMT change between groups was observed (p = 0.708). However, in a subgroup analysis with participants with high baseline mean ccIMT (≥0.800 mm) a significant difference in mean ccIMT change between intervention (-0.023 [95% CI -0.052, 0.007] mm; n = 22; baseline mean ccIMT: 0.884 ± 0.015 mm) and control (0.041 [95% CI 0.009, 0.073] mm; n = 13; baseline mean ccIMT: 0.881 ± 0.022 mm) was observed (p = 0.004). Adjusting for potential confounders did not substantially alter the results. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that healthy lifestyle changes can beneficially affect ccIMT within 6 months and that such a beneficial effect may be more easily demonstrated if participants with high baseline ccIMT are recruited. The observed effect is of relevance for the prevention of CVD events, including myocardial infarction and stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koeder et al. (2021) studied General population (n=201). Lifestyle intervention vs. No intervention was evaluated on Mean ccIMT change from baseline to 6 months (p=0.708). A 6-month controlled lifestyle intervention did not significantly reduce mean common carotid intima-media thickness compared to no intervention in the overall study population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: