Key result
Neither the Complete Health Improvement Program nor the Healthy Heart program induced carotid plaque regression in patients with established coronary artery disease over 9 months.
Why the study?
Data comparing the effects of different lifestyle regimens on carotid plaque regression in patients with established CAD or CAD equivalent were lacking.
Does the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) reduce carotid intima-media thickness compared to the Healthy Heart program in patients with established coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=120)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) reduce carotid intima-media thickness compared to the Healthy Heart program in patients with established coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.02% vs 0.03%
p-value: p=0.45
An intensive, sequential lifestyle program (CHIP) did not significantly regress carotid plaque compared to a nonsequential program (Healthy Heart) over 9 months, though both interventions improved various cardiovascular risk factors.
Intensive lifestyle programs do not regress carotid plaque in CAD; challenges expectations for atherosclerosis reversal over 9 months.
BACKGROUND: The cardioprotective effects of intensive lifestyle regimens in primary prevention have been elucidated; however, there is a paucity of data comparing the effects of different lifestyle regimens in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD equivalent, specifically vis-à-vis carotid plaque regression. METHODS: We performed a randomized, single-center, single-blind study in 120 patients with established CAD. Patients were randomly assigned to either 9 months of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP), an outpatient lifestyle enrichment program that focuses on improving dietary choices, enhancing daily exercise, increasing support systems, and decreasing stress; or to 9 months of an ad hoc, nonsequential combination of various healthy living classes offered separately through a health maintenance organization and referred to as the Healthy Heart program. Baseline and 9-month change in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) were measured. RESULTS: Among 120 participants, data were analyzed for 79, of which 68 (86%) completed the study. Both average CIMT and average maximum CIMT increased over 9 months, but the changes between groups were insignificant. There were marked differences in the mean body mass index favoring the CHIP group (-1.9 [standard deviation = 1.9]; p < 0.001) and statistically significant within-group improvements in blood pressure, triglyceride level, 6-minute walk test result, self-assessment well-being score, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score that were not observed between groups. CONCLUSION: Neither the CHIP nor Healthy Heart was effective in inducing plaque regression in patients with established CAD after a 9-month period. However, both were effective in improving several CAD risk factors, which shows that the nonsequential offering of healthy lifestyle programs can lead to similar outcomes as a formal, sequential, established program (CHIP) in many aspects. These results have important implications as to how lifestyle changes will be implemented as tertiary prevention measures in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkoustaf et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Coronary Artery Disease (n=120). Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) vs. Healthy Heart (HH) program was evaluated on Change in average carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) at 9 months (p=0.45). Neither the Complete Health Improvement Program nor the Healthy Heart program induced carotid plaque regression in patients with established coronary artery disease over 9 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: