Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyses of dispositional ascriptions in terms of conditional statements famously confront the problems of finks and masks. We argue that conditional analyses of dispositions, even those tailored to avoid.nks and masks, face five further problems. These are the problems of: (i) Achilles' heels, (ii) accidental closeness, (iii) comparatives, (iv) explaining context sensitivity, and (v) absent stimulus conditions. We conclude by offering a proposal that avoids all seven of these problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manley et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: