Key result
A multifaceted blood pressure intervention led 86% of patients to report a positive effect from study participation, compared to 62% of those receiving usual care.
Why the study?
Does a multifaceted blood pressure control intervention involving technology and pharmacist-led management improve patient experiences and blood pressure control compared to usual care?
RCT (n=146)
randomly assigned
Does a multifaceted blood pressure control intervention involving technology and pharmacist-led management improve patient experiences and blood pressure control compared to usual care?
Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 62%
A multifaceted intervention using home BP monitoring, interactive voice response technology, and pharmacist-led management improves patient empowerment, provider relationships, and self-reported positive effects on health.
Highlights potential patient-centered advantages of multifaceted BP interventions; leaves open effects on objective outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of multifaceted interventions from the study participants' perspective. We conducted qualitative interviews to understand patients' experiences with a multifaceted blood pressure (BP) control intervention involving interactive voice response technology, home BP monitoring, and pharmacist-led BP management. In the randomized study, the intervention resulted in clinically significant decreases in BP. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used insights generated from in-depth interviews from all study participants randomly assigned to the multifaceted intervention or usual care (n=146) to create a model explaining the observed improvements in health behavior and clinical outcomes. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods and consultative and reflexive team analysis. Six explanatory factors emerged from the patients' interviews: (1) improved relationships with medical personnel; (2) increased knowledge of hypertension; (3) increased participation in their health care and personal empowerment; (4) greater understanding of the impact of health behavior on BP; (5) high satisfaction with technology used in the intervention; and, for some patients, (6) increased health care utilization. Eighty-six percent of the intervention patients and 62% of the usual care patients stated that study participation had a positive effect on them. Of those expressing a positive effect, 68% (intervention) and 55% (usual care) reached their systolic BP goal. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing bidirectional conversations between patients and providers is a key element of successful hypertension management. Home BP monitoring coupled with interactive voice response technology reporting facilitates such conversations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lambert‐Kerzner et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=146). Multifaceted blood pressure control intervention (interactive voice response, home BP monitoring, pharmacist-led management) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Stated that study participation had a positive effect on them. A multifaceted blood pressure intervention led 86% of patients to report a positive effect from study participation, compared to 62% of those receiving usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: