Systematic screening for secondary hypertension reveals a high prevalence of curable causes, challenging the traditional paradigm that essential hypertension accounts for 95-99% of all cases.
The exclusion of causes of hypertension is not systematically exploited in clinical practice. Therefore, essential hypertension is consistently presented as the most prevalent 'cause'. The paradox of a condition with unknown causes being described as a common cause of hypertension translates into a diagnosis of essential hypertension in most patients, which precludes the detection of a curable cause of hypertension. The aim of this review is to investigate how the notion of essential hypertension has developed and whether scientific evidence still support the notion of its high prevalence by examining the most recent studies. These studies provided solid scientific evidence that, when systematically sought for, secondary hypertension is quite common and that secondary hypertension is highly prevalent. The increased awareness should lead to a systematic search for, with the goal of curing or achieving a better control of high blood pressure, and ultimately improving patients' quality of life.
Rossi et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Arterial hypertension. Systematic screening for secondary hypertension vs. Standard care (presumed essential hypertension) was evaluated. Systematic screening for secondary hypertension reveals a high prevalence of curable causes, challenging the traditional paradigm that essential hypertension accounts for 95-99% of all cases.