Why the study?
Secondary tricuspid regurgitation is frequent and diagnostically challenging in HFrEF, prompting investigation into whether circulating neurohumoral biomarkers can supplement the imaging-based diagnostic process.
Does the integration of circulating biomarkers with echocardiography improve risk stratification for long-term mortality in HFrEF patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=576)
Does the integration of circulating biomarkers with echocardiography improve risk stratification for long-term mortality in HFrEF patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation?
Integrating circulating biomarkers like MR-proANP and CT-pro-ET1 with echocardiography significantly improves risk stratification for long-term mortality in HFrEF patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation.
Secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) is frequent among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), however it confers considerable diagnostic challenges. The assessment of neurohumoral activation may constitute a valuable supplement to the current imaging-based diagnostic process. This study sought to investigate the expression of complementary biomarkers in sTR and to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating their assessment into the diagnostic process. We enrolled 576 HFrEF patients recording echocardiographic and biochemical measurements, i.e., N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-pro-ET1), and copeptin. Plasma levels of the aforementioned neurohormones were significantly elevated with increasing sTR severity (p < 0.001 for all). CT-pro-ET1 and MR-proANP were the closest related to severe sTR (adj. OR 1.46; 95%CI 1.11–1.91, p = 0.006 and adj. OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.13–1.87, p = 0.004, respectively). In patients with moderate-to-severe sTR, adding selected biomarkers (i.e., CT-pro-ET1 and MR-proANP) resulted in a substantial improvement in the discriminatory power regarding long-term mortality (C-statistic: 0.54 vs. 0.65, p < 0.001; continuous NRI 57%, p < 0.001). Circulating biomarkers closely relate to sTR severity and correlate with hemodynamic and morphologic mechanisms of sTR. Specifically, MR-proANP and CT-pro-ET1 are closely linked to the presence of severe sTR, and a combined assessment with the guideline recommended echocardiographic grading significantly improves individual risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spinka et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Secondary tricuspid regurgitation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=576). Integration of CT-pro-ET1 and MR-proANP biomarkers vs. Echocardiographic grading alone was evaluated on Discriminatory power for long-term mortality (C-statistic) (continuous NRI 57%, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: