Key result
Narrative review highlights advanced therapies, DOACs, and multidisciplinary teams to optimize PE management.
Why the study?
Rapid expansion in diagnostic and therapeutic data has necessitated structuralizing the multidisciplinary approach and organizing the literature on new and emerging therapies for pulmonary embolism.
This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of pulmonary embolism management, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT) to navigate advanced diagnostic and therapeutic options.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PERT and DOAC integration in PE care; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
Advances in imaging, pharmacological, and procedural technologies have rapidly expanded the care of pulmonary embolism. Earlier, more accurate identification and quantification has enhanced risk stratification across the spectrum of the disease process, with a number of clinical tools available to prognosticate outcomes and guide treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants have enabled a consistent and more convenient long-term therapeutic option, with a greater shift toward outpatient treatment for a select group of low-risk patients. The array of catheter-directed therapies now available has contributed to a more versatile and nuanced armamentarium of treatment options, including ultrasound-facilitated thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. Research into supportive care for pulmonary embolism have explored the optimal use of vasopressors and volume resuscitation, as well as utilization of various devices, including right ventricular mechanical support and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Even in the realm of surgery, outcomes have steadily improved in experienced centers. This rapid expansion in diagnostic and therapeutic data has necessitated implementation of pulmonary embolism response teams to better interpret the available evidence, manage the utilization of advanced therapies, and coordinate multidisciplinary care. We provide a narrative review of the risk stratification and management of pulmonary embolism, with a focus on structuralizing the multidisciplinary approach and organizing the literature on new and emerging therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benavente et al. (2024) conducted a review in Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism management strategies was evaluated. A narrative review of the evolving landscape of pulmonary embolism management highlights the role of advanced therapies, DOACs, and multidisciplinary response teams in optimizing patient care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: