Key result
Team-guided advanced revascularization strategies facilitate early recognition and coordinated care for high-risk PE.
Why the study?
Management of pulmonary embolism has evolved substantially over several decades, yet optimal integration of emerging therapies remains challenging.
A 4-decade single-center experience highlights the importance of early physiologic recognition of severity, selective use of reperfusion therapies, and a dedicated multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) for managing high-risk PE.
Single-center experience suggests physiologic assessment may refine PE therapy selection; leaves open need for multicenter RCTs before wider adoption.
Management of pulmonary embolism (PE) has evolved substantially over the past several decades, yet optimal integration of emerging therapies remains challenging. This Perspective describes our 4 decade, single-center experience reflecting the transition from systemic thrombolysis to catheter-directed therapies (CDT) and, more recently, large bore mechanical thrombectomy supported by interventional cardiology with ECMO back-up. Our approach has increasingly focused on physiologic assessment including right ventricular function, pulmonary artery pressures, and cardiac output in the face of the patient's age, underlying cardiopulmonary disease and presence of proximal deep vein thrombosis. This evolution has been characterized by progressive adoption of CDT, reassessment, and refinement of therapies in response to both clinical experience, emerging evidence and participation in clinical trials. The development of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) and more recently integration of artificial intelligence detection systems have further improved early recognition of intermediate and high-risk PE cases and coordination of care. Our experience over four decades highlights key lessons and the importance of early physiologic recognition of severity, selective use of reperfusion therapies, and the critical role of a dedicated multidisciplinary system of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenspon et al. (2026) conducted a review in High-risk pulmonary embolism. Advanced revascularization strategies (catheter-directed therapies and mechanical thrombectomy) was evaluated. Advanced revascularization strategies, including catheter-directed therapies and mechanical thrombectomy guided by a multidisciplinary response team, facilitate early physiologic recognition and coordinated care for high-risk pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: