Key result
Implantable cardiac monitors were associated with a 57% faster overall time to anticoagulation and lower all-cause mortality compared to external monitors in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Why the study?
Do implantable cardiac monitors reduce time to AF detection, time to anticoagulation, and all-cause mortality compared to external cardiac monitors in patients with cryptogenic stroke?
Do implantable cardiac monitors reduce time to AF detection, time to anticoagulation, and all-cause mortality compared to external cardiac monitors in patients with cryptogenic stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial highlights that while ICMs in cryptogenic stroke are associated with faster AF detection and earlier anticoagulation, the observed mortality benefit requires confirmation in randomized controlled trials.
Although up to one-third of ischemic strokes do not have a clearly defined mechanism and are labeled as “cryptogenic,” many affected individuals are suspected of having subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF). Defining the stroke etiology directly impacts management. Most patients are treated with antiplatelet therapy alone in the absence of AF because empirical initiation of anticoagulant therapy has not been shown to improve outcomes in several studies.1Hart R.G. Sharma M. Mundl H. et al.Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source.N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 2191-2201Crossref PubMed Scopus (488) Google Scholar,2Diener H.C. Sacco R.L. Easton J.D. et al.Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source.N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1906-1917Crossref PubMed Scopus (368) Google Scholar The impact of AF detection and consequent gain from anticoagulation therapy formed the premise for several randomized control trials that investigated prolonged rhythm monitoring strategies in patients with cryptogenic stroke.3Gladstone D.J. Spring M. Dorian P. et al.Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2467-2477Crossref PubMed Scopus (849) Google Scholar,4Sanna T. Diener H.C. Passman R.S. et al.Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2478-2486Crossref PubMed Scopus (1318) Google Scholar Although these studies confirmed that event-triggered recorders and implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide a much higher yield for AF detection, they did not assess the impact of early AF detection on hard endpoints such as recurrent stroke and mortality. A study to clarify this unaddressed gap in the knowledge has been long overdue.In this issue of Heart Rhythm O2, Yaghi et al5Yaghi S. Ryan M.P. Gunnarsson C.L. et al.Longitudinal outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without long-term cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 223-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar provide a real-world perspective on how the intensity of cardiac rhythm monitoring can impact outcomes in cryptogenic stroke. Using data derived from a United States claims database, the authors compared longitudinal outcomes in patients who received ICMs to those who received external cardiac monitors (ECMs) only. This retrospective claims-based analysis included data from 12,994 patients with mean follow-up of 3.17 years for ECM patients and 1.92 years for ICM patients. The rates of AF detection were high in both arms (49% and 40%) compared to the CRYSTAL AF (Cryptogenic Stroke and Underlying Atrial Fibrillation) study (30% at 3 years), although the cohort in the present study was older (∼67 vs ∼62 years) and consisted of more female participants (∼54% vs ∼36%), despite lower mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (∼2.6 vs ∼3.0).4Sanna T. Diener H.C. Passman R.S. et al.Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2478-2486Crossref PubMed Scopus (1318) Google Scholar,6Brachmann J. Morillo C.A. Sanna T. et al.Uncovering atrial fibrillation beyond short-term monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients: three-year results from the Cryptogenic Stroke and Underlying Atrial Fibrillation Trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9e003333Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar In an analysis adjusted for baseline clinical characteristics, the key finding was that the use of ICMs was associated with reduced time to AF detection, reduced time to initiation of oral anticoagulation, and lower all-cause mortality. The results highlight the need to be vigilant for AF in cryptogenic stroke and provide a persuasive argument to further investigate the merits of early ICM implantation.The past decade has seen tremendous advancements in ICM technology, including improved electrogram acquisition, AF detection algorithms, and remote monitoring capabilities.7Deneke T. Cabanas P. Hofer D. et al.New-generation miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: insertion procedure, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success in a real-world population.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 152-159Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar,8Sanders P. Purerfellner H. Pokushalov E. et al.Reveal LINQ Usability Investigators. Performance of a new atrial fibrillation detection algorithm in a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: results from the Reveal LINQ Usability Study.Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13: 1425-1430Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar Despite these advancements and the cumbersome, inconvenient nature of ambulatory monitoring, ICMs have not been routinely adopted in the workup of cryptogenic stroke. Even in the present study by Yaghi et al,5Yaghi S. Ryan M.P. Gunnarsson C.L. et al.Longitudinal outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without long-term cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 223-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar only 10% of included patients received an ICM. Although others have suggested ICMs are a cost-effective alternative to ambulatory monitoring, harnessing the additional information they provide to improve patient outcomes remains a challenge.9Sawyer L.M. Witte K.K. Reynolds M.R. et al.Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.J Comp Eff Res. 2021; 10: 127-141Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar The risk of stroke in individuals with AF is a complex, time-dependent interaction between rhythm, atrial contractile function, and comorbidities that promote a prothrombotic milieu. Although there are robust data confirming that subclinical AF carries an increased risk of thromboembolism, quantifying this risk has proved difficult, and this complicates decisions surrounding anticoagulation.10Mahajan R. Perera T. Elliott A.D. et al.Subclinical device-detected atrial fibrillation and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 1407-1415Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google ScholarFirst, the burden of subclinical AF that constitutes an elevated stroke risk remains elusive. Studies involving nonstroke populations with implanted pacemakers or defibrillators suggested that, beyond a certain threshold, a dose–response relationship between subclinical AF burden and stroke risk exists. However, the minimum burden of AF that defines an elevated risk remains unclear.11Van Gelder I.C. Healey J.S. Crijns H. et al.Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT.Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 1339-1344Crossref PubMed Scopus (323) Google Scholar,12Glotzer T.V. Daoud E.G. Wyse D.G. et al.The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2: 474-480Crossref PubMed Scopus (656) Google Scholar Second, the temporal proximity of an AF episode to a stroke event that implies causation has not been established. In TRENDS (Prospective Study of the Clinical Significance of Atrial Arrhythmias Detected by Implanted Device Diagnostics), 45% of patients with device-detected AF who suffered cerebrovascular events or systemic emboli had no atrial arrhythmia in the 30 days before their event.12Glotzer T.V. Daoud E.G. Wyse D.G. et al.The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2: 474-480Crossref PubMed Scopus (656) Google Scholar In some patients, AF may simply be a manifestation of an elevated cardiovascular risk profile rather than the direct mechanism of their stroke. Therefore, whether a brief episode of device-detected AF several months after a stroke merits anticoagulation is unknown. Third, risk factors independent of AF status may contribute to occult cardioembolism in cryptogenic stroke. In the present study, the mortality benefit seen in the ICM arm may have been due to early anticoagulation in patients without AF. Approximately 20% of patients in both arms received anticoagulation despite never developing AF, and patients who received an ICM seemed to receive anticoagulation much earlier. In fact, although the overall time to anticoagulation was 57% faster in patients receiving an ICM, this value fell to only 12% when the analysis was restricted to patients diagnosed with AF. This result suggests that variables other than AF detection may have influenced anticoagulation in the ICM arm as well as any associated mortality benefit. It also is plausible that the ability of novel oral anticoagulation therapy to inhibit atrial fibrosis and development of the AF substrate might have contributed in part.13Spronk H.M. De Jong A.M. Verheule S. et al.Hypercoagulability causes atrial fibrosis and promotes atrial fibrillation.Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 38-50Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar For example, there is an evolving concept of an atrial myopathy whereby myocardial fibrosis and a stiff, poorly contractile left atrium can lead to increased blood stasis. Identifying atrial myopathy in the clinical setting through biomarkers, advanced electrocardiographic signal processing, or magnetic resonance imaging may further assist risk stratification of AF risk in those with cryptogenic stroke, to guide patient selection for ICM use and maximize its cost-effectiveness, and warrants further investigation.14Noubiap J.J. Sanders P. Nattel S. Lau D.H. Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: pathogenesis and clinical implications.Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021; 13: 221-233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google ScholarIn summary, this thought-provoking study by Yaghi et al5Yaghi S. Ryan M.P. Gunnarsson C.L. et al.Longitudinal outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without long-term cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 223-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar raises several important issues. Although we cannot confidently infer a causative link between earlier AF detection and reduced mortality, the results emphasize the need for randomized control trials to confirm such a relationship. Consideration also must be given to the practicalities of ICM use, including streamlining referrals between neurologists and implanting cardiologists, managing false-positive alerts that frequently occur with remote monitoring, and expediting oral anticoagulation if a critical burden of AF is exceeded.15O'Shea C.J. Middeldorp M.E. Hendriks J.M. et al.Remote monitoring of implantable loop recorders: false-positive alert episode burden.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021; 14e009635Google Scholar Despite the complexities surrounding anticoagulation therapy, it is evident that subclinical AF is common in cryptogenic stroke, and clinicians must recognize associated cardiometabolic risk factors and treat them aggressively. At the same time, we are reminded that many patients with cryptogenic stroke do not manifest AF, and equal attention should be paid to other stroke etiologies such as unstable plaque due to symptomatic nonstenotic carotid disease, with further research needed to delineate potential cardioembolism due to atrial myopathy without AF. Meanwhile, as we seek to clarify the importance of subclinical AF and better define the role of ICMs and oral anticoagulation therapy in cryptogenic stroke, clinicians must remain on the lookout for clinical AF in which data supporting anticoagulation are unequivocal. Although up to one-third of ischemic strokes do not have a clearly defined mechanism and are labeled as “cryptogenic,” many affected individuals are suspected of having subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF). Defining the stroke etiology directly impacts management. Most patients are treated with antiplatelet therapy alone in the absence of AF because empirical initiation of anticoagulant therapy has not been shown to improve outcomes in several studies.1Hart R.G. Sharma M. Mundl H. et al.Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source.N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 2191-2201Crossref PubMed Scopus (488) Google Scholar,2Diener H.C. Sacco R.L. Easton J.D. et al.Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source.N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1906-1917Crossref PubMed Scopus (368) Google Scholar The impact of AF detection and consequent gain from anticoagulation therapy formed the premise for several randomized control trials that investigated prolonged rhythm monitoring strategies in patients with cryptogenic stroke.3Gladstone D.J. Spring M. Dorian P. et al.Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2467-2477Crossref PubMed Scopus (849) Google Scholar,4Sanna T. Diener H.C. Passman R.S. et al.Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2478-2486Crossref PubMed Scopus (1318) Google Scholar Although these studies confirmed that event-triggered recorders and implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide a much higher yield for AF detection, they did not assess the impact of early AF detection on hard endpoints such as recurrent stroke and mortality. A study to clarify this unaddressed gap in the knowledge has been long overdue. In this issue of Heart Rhythm O2, Yaghi et al5Yaghi S. Ryan M.P. Gunnarsson C.L. et al.Longitudinal outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without long-term cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 223-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar provide a real-world perspective on how the intensity of cardiac rhythm monitoring can impact outcomes in cryptogenic stroke. Using data derived from a United States claims database, the authors compared longitudinal outcomes in patients who received ICMs to those who received external cardiac monitors (ECMs) only. This retrospective claims-based analysis included data from 12,994 patients with mean follow-up of 3.17 years for ECM patients and 1.92 years for ICM patients. The rates of AF detection were high in both arms (49% and 40%) compared to the CRYSTAL AF (Cryptogenic Stroke and Underlying Atrial Fibrillation) study (30% at 3 years), although the cohort in the present study was older (∼67 vs ∼62 years) and consisted of more female participants (∼54% vs ∼36%), despite lower mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (∼2.6 vs ∼3.0).4Sanna T. Diener H.C. Passman R.S. et al.Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 2478-2486Crossref PubMed Scopus (1318) Google Scholar,6Brachmann J. Morillo C.A. Sanna T. et al.Uncovering atrial fibrillation beyond short-term monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients: three-year results from the Cryptogenic Stroke and Underlying Atrial Fibrillation Trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9e003333Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar In an analysis adjusted for baseline clinical characteristics, the key finding was that the use of ICMs was associated with reduced time to AF detection, reduced time to initiation of oral anticoagulation, and lower all-cause mortality. The results highlight the need to be vigilant for AF in cryptogenic stroke and provide a persuasive argument to further investigate the merits of early ICM implantation. The past decade has seen tremendous advancements in ICM technology, including improved electrogram acquisition, AF detection algorithms, and remote monitoring capabilities.7Deneke T. Cabanas P. Hofer D. et al.New-generation miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: insertion procedure, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success in a real-world population.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 152-159Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar,8Sanders P. Purerfellner H. Pokushalov E. et al.Reveal LINQ Usability Investigators. Performance of a new atrial fibrillation detection algorithm in a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: results from the Reveal LINQ Usability Study.Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13: 1425-1430Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar Despite these advancements and the cumbersome, inconvenient nature of ambulatory monitoring, ICMs have not been routinely adopted in the workup of cryptogenic stroke. Even in the present study by Yaghi et al,5Yaghi S. Ryan M.P. Gunnarsson C.L. et al.Longitudinal outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without long-term cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 223-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar only 10% of included patients received an ICM. Although others have suggested ICMs are a cost-effective alternative to ambulatory monitoring, harnessing the additional information they provide to improve patient outcomes remains a challenge.9Sawyer L.M. Witte K.K. Reynolds M.R. et al.Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.J Comp Eff Res. 2021; 10: 127-141Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar The risk of stroke in individuals with AF is a complex, time-dependent interaction between rhythm, atrial contractile function, and comorbidities that promote a prothrombotic milieu. Although there are robust data confirming that subclinical AF carries an increased risk of thromboembolism, quantifying this risk has proved difficult, and this complicates decisions surrounding anticoagulation.10Mahajan R. Perera T. Elliott A.D. et al.Subclinical device-detected atrial fibrillation and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 1407-1415Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar First, the burden of subclinical AF that constitutes an elevated stroke risk remains elusive. Studies involving nonstroke populations with implanted pacemakers or defibrillators suggested that, beyond a certain threshold, a dose–response relationship between subclinical AF burden and stroke risk exists. However, the minimum burden of AF that defines an elevated risk remains unclear.11Van Gelder I.C. Healey J.S. Crijns H. et al.Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT.Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 1339-1344Crossref PubMed Scopus (323) Google Scholar,12Glotzer T.V. Daoud E.G. Wyse D.G. et al.The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2: 474-480Crossref PubMed Scopus (656) Google Scholar Second, the temporal proximity of an AF episode to a stroke event that implies causation has not been established. In TRENDS (Prospective Study of the Clinical Significance of Atrial Arrhythmias Detected by Implanted Device Diagnostics), 45% of patients with device-detected AF who suffered cerebrovascular events or systemic emboli had no atrial arrhythmia in the 30 days before their event.12Glotzer T.V. Daoud E.G. Wyse D.G. et al.The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2: 474-480Crossref PubMed Scopus (656) Google Scholar In some patients, AF may simply be a manifestation of an elevated cardiovascular risk profile rather than the direct mechanism of their stroke. Therefore, whether a brief episode of device-detected AF several months after a stroke merits anticoagulation is unknown. Third, risk factors independent of AF status may contribute to occult cardioembolism in cryptogenic stroke. In the present study, the mortality benefit seen in the ICM arm may have been due to early anticoagulation in patients without AF. Approximately 20% of patients in both arms received anticoagulation despite never developing AF, and patients who received an ICM seemed to receive anticoagulation much earlier. In fact, although the overall time to anticoagulation was 57% faster in patients receiving an ICM, this value fell to only 12% when the analysis was restricted to patients diagnosed with AF. This result suggests that variables other than AF detection may have influenced anticoagulation in the ICM arm as well as any associated mortality benefit. It also is plausible that the ability of novel oral anticoagulation therapy to inhibit atrial fibrosis and development of the AF substrate might have contributed in part.13Spronk H.M. De Jong A.M. Verheule S. et al.Hypercoagulability causes atrial fibrosis and promotes atrial fibrillation.Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 38-50Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar For example, there is an evolving concept of an atrial myopathy whereby myocardial fibrosis and a stiff, poorly contractile left atrium can lead to increased blood stasis. Identifying atrial myopathy in the clinical setting through biomarkers, advanced electrocardiographic signal processing, or magnetic resonance imaging may further assist risk stratification of AF risk in those with cryptogenic stroke, to guide patient selection for ICM use and maximize its cost-effectiveness, and warrants further investigation.14Noubiap J.J. Sanders P. Nattel S. Lau D.H. Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: pathogenesis and clinical implications.Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021; 13: 221-233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar In summary, this thought-provoking study by Yaghi et al5Yaghi S. Ryan M.P. Gunnarsson C.L. et al.Longitudinal outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without long-term cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 223-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar raises several important issues. Although we cannot confidently infer a causative link between earlier AF detection and reduced mortality, the results emphasize the need for randomized control trials to confirm such a relationship. Consideration also must be given to the practicalities of ICM use, including streamlining referrals between neurologists and implanting cardiologists, managing false-positive alerts that frequently occur with remote monitoring, and expediting oral anticoagulation if a critical burden of AF is exceeded.15O'Shea C.J. Middeldorp M.E. Hendriks J.M. et al.Remote monitoring of implantable loop recorders: false-positive alert episode burden.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021; 14e009635Google Scholar Despite the complexities surrounding anticoagulation therapy, it is evident that subclinical AF is common in cryptogenic stroke, and clinicians must recognize associated cardiometabolic risk factors and treat them aggressively. At the same time, we are reminded that many patients with cryptogenic stroke do not manifest AF, and equal attention should be paid to other stroke etiologies such as unstable plaque due to symptomatic nonstenotic carotid disease, with further research needed to delineate potential cardioembolism due to atrial myopathy without AF. Meanwhile, as we seek to clarify the importance of subclinical AF and better define the role of ICMs and oral anticoagulation therapy in cryptogenic stroke, clinicians must remain on the lookout for clinical AF in which data supporting anticoagulation are unequivocal. This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiyagarajah et al. (2022) conducted an editorial in Cryptogenic stroke (n=12,994). Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) vs. External cardiac monitors (ECMs) was evaluated on Time to atrial fibrillation detection, time to initiation of oral anticoagulation, and all-cause mortality. Implantable cardiac monitors were associated with a 57% faster overall time to anticoagulation and lower all-cause mortality compared to external monitors in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: