PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2000Archives of Internal Medicine585 citationsOpen Access

Pulse Pressure Not Mean Pressure Determines Cardiovascular Risk in Older Hypertensive Patients

View Full Paper
JBJacques BlacherJSJan A. StaessenXGXavier Girerd

Key Points

  • To investigate the separate impacts of pulse pressure and mean pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in older hypertensive individuals.
  • Meta-analysis of individual patient data from three major trials involving 840, 4695, and 2394 participants.

Structured PICO

Does pulse pressure independently determine cardiovascular risk better than mean pressure in older hypertensive patients?

P
Population
7,929 older hypertensive patients pooled from 3 trials (European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly trial [n=840], Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial [n=4695], and Systolic Hypertension in China Trial [n=2394]).
I
Intervention
Pulse pressure (pulsatile component of blood pressure)
C
Comparator
Mean pressure (steady component of blood pressure)
O
Outcome
Major cardiovascular complications (including coronary end points and cardiovascular mortality)hard clinical

Pulse pressure, rather than mean arterial pressure, is the primary determinant of cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients, suggesting guidelines should incorporate pulsatile hemodynamics.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the management of hypertension rest almost completely on the measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. However, the arterial blood pressure wave is more correctly described as consisting of a pulsatile (pulse pressure) and a steady (mean pressure) component. OBJECTIVE: To explore the independent roles of pulse pressure and mean pressure as determinants of cardiovascular prognosis in older hypertensive patients. METHODS: This meta-analysis, based on individual patient data, pooled the results of the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly trial (n = 840), the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial (n = 4695), and the Systolic Hypertension in China Trial (n = 2394). The relative hazard rates associated with pulse pressure and mean pressure were calculated using Cox regression analysis, with stratification for the 3 trials and with adjustments for sex, age, previous cardiovascular complications, smoking, and treatment group. RESULTS: A 10-mm Hg wider pulse pressure increased the risk of major cardiovascular complications; after controlling for mean pressure and the other covariates, the increase in risk ranged from approximately 13% for all coronary end points (P = .02) to nearly 20% for cardiovascular mortality (P = .001). In a similar analysis, mean pressure predicted the incidence of cardiovascular complications but only after removal of pulse pressure as an explanatory variable from the model. Furthermore, the probability of a major cardiovascular end point increased with higher systolic blood pressure; at any given level of systolic blood pressure, it also increased with lower diastolic blood pressure, suggesting that the wider pulse pressure was driving the risk of major complications. CONCLUSIONS: In older hypertensive patients, pulse pressure not mean pressure is the major determinant of cardiovascular risk. The implications of these findings for the management of hypertensive patients should be further investigated in randomized controlled outcome trials in which the pulsatile component of blood pressure is differently affected by antihypertensive drug treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blacher et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a121e9eea48cb855a343e09https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.8.1085
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper