Retrospective study shows tafamidis reduces mortality and heart failure worsening in ATTR-CM patients, indicating slowed cardiac deterioration.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is an under-recognized condition with high mortality if untreated. Tafamidis, a transthyretin stabilizer, reduces mortality and cardiovascular events in ATTR-CM, but data in Korean populations are limited. This study evaluated the impact of tafamidis on survival and disease progression in Korean ATTR-CM patients using strain analysis of the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV) and left atrium (LA). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 77 patients with confirmed ATTR-CM between July 2010 and June 2024. Patients were grouped as untreated or treated with tafamidis 20 mg or 80 mg. Strain analysis was performed at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and worsening heart failure. RESULTS: Compared with the untreated group, the tafamidis 20 mg group had a lower risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12, 0.73), with similar benefit in the 80 mg group (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.83). LV global longitudinal strain showed no significant difference (p=0.904). In contrast, LA stiffness index (LASI) and RV-pulmonary circulation coupling index deteriorated markedly in the untreated group. Over a median follow-up of 17.5 months, LASI worsened by 43.2% in the untreated group, compared to 8.0% and 8.7% increases in the 20 mg and 80 mg groups. RV-pulmonary circulation coupling index decreased by 35.8% and 1.2%, but increased by 10.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tafamidis was associated with improved survival and slower disease progression in Korean ATTR-CM. LASI and RV-pulmonary circulation coupling index may serve as sensitive markers of treatment response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: