Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
he least restrictive environment (LRE) doctrine in the Individual with Dis-abilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates that students with disabilities be educated together with students without disabilities. Placing students with disabilities into a separate adapted physical education program should occur only when the students are clearly not successful in general physical education (GPE) or when they pose a clear safety risk to others or to themselves (Wright Wright, 2005). This LRE doctrine has been interpreted to suggest that most students with disabilities should start out in GPE with supplemental aids and supports as needed to ensure success. If the student is not successful even with these supports, then the student can be placed in an alternative setting (Block, 1996, 2007). Unfortunately, in practice, students with more severe disabilities never have the opportunity to try GPE. These students are directly placed in an alternative setting because the student’s IEP team (including the GPE teacher) believes that the student will not be safe or successful in GPE, will not benefi t from GPE activities, or may require so many accommodations that his or her participation will detract from the experi-ence of peers without disabilities. While these are all valid concerns, many students with severe disabilities can safely, successfully, and meaningfully participate in GPE programs at all age levels with careful planning and proper support (Block,
Block et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: