Key result
Non-pharmacological interventions strongly improve self-reported sleep quality among patients with CAD.
Why the study?
To determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and identify characteristics affecting intervention effectiveness.
Do non-pharmacological interventions improve sleep outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease?
Population
Patients with coronary artery disease across 42 studies (30 in meta-analysis)
Comparison
Non-pharmacological interventions vs comparator controls
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors
Loading...
Non-pharmacological interventions warrant consideration to improve sleep quality in CAD; reinforces aggregated trial evidence for self-reported outcomes.
Meta-Analysis
Do non-pharmacological interventions improve sleep outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: SMD -0.85 (95% CI -1.08, -0.63)
Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly environmental control, significantly improve self-reported sleep quality in patients with coronary artery disease, though they do not affect objectively measured sleep parameters.
Park et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease. Non-pharmacological interventions was evaluated on Self-reported sleep quality (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.08, -0.63). Non-pharmacological interventions significantly improved self-reported sleep quality among patients with coronary artery disease (SMD -0.85; 95% CI -1.08, -0.63).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: