PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1997European Heart Journal71 citationsOpen Access

Pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns in 143 normal subjects aged 20 to 80 years old: An echo 2D colour Doppler cooperative study

View Full Paper
FGFrancesco GentileUniversity of PisaAMAntonio ManteroVenice International UniversityALAntonio LippolisGastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis"

Key Result

Age is the principal determinant of Doppler pulmonary venous flow parameters in healthy subjects, showing the strongest correlation with the systolic/diastolic peak velocity ratio (r = 0.73).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=143)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

What are the normal values and determinants of pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography in healthy subjects?

P
Population
143 healthy subjects aged 20 to 80 years
I
Intervention
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography of pulmonary venous flow
O
Outcome
Doppler pulmonary venous flow parameters (peak velocity and integral of systolic, diastolic, and atrial reversal waves)surrogate

Age is the primary determinant of pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns in healthy subjects, which should be accounted for when interpreting these echocardiographic parameters.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r = 0.73

Limitations

  • The atrial reversal wave was more difficult and probably less reliable to measure than the systolic and diastolic waves.
  • Moderate inter-observer variability was observed for the systolic, diastolic and atrial reversal wave peak velocities and integrals.

Abstract

In order to find out the normal values and to evaluate the effects of age, heart rate, sex, and haemodynamic and standard echocardiographic parameters on pulmonary venous flow velocity obtained by the transthoracic approach. Doppler pulmonary venous flow parameters were measured in 143 healthy subjects aged from 20 to 80 years. Doppler pulmonary venous flow parameters which had the best correlation with age were: the peak velocity of the systolic wave (r = 0.39) and its integral (r = 0.5), the peak velocity of the diastolic wave (r = -0.6) and its integral (r = -0.44); the systolic (r = 0.68) and diastolic fractions (r = -0.68); the systolic/diastolic peak velocity ratio (r = 0.73) and the systolic/diastolic integral ratio (r = 0.7). The atrial reversal wave did not correlate with age; the atrial reversal wave was more difficult and probably less reliable to measure than the systolic and diastolic waves. The correlations of pulmonary venous flow parameters with mitral flow parameters were also examined. This study showed that, in healthy subjects, despite an increase in the early and atrial waves from the annulus to the tips of the mitral leaflets, there is a similar association between pulmonary venous flow and mitral flow measured at the annulus or at the tips of the mitral leaflets. The intra-observer reproducibility of all the pulmonary venous flow parameters considered were found to be excellent. Moderate inter-observer variability was observed for the systolic, diastolic and atrial reversal wave peak velocities and integrals; however, the systolic/diastolic ratio improved the precision of the measurements. Multivariate analysis showed that age is the principal determinant of the Doppler parameters of pulmonary venous flow: heart rate, sex, body surface area, the size of the left atrium in systole and the left ventricular ejection fraction all influence the Doppler parameters of pulmonary venous flow, even if only slightly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gentile et al. (1997) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=143). Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was evaluated on Correlation of pulmonary venous flow parameters with age (r = 0.73). Age is the principal determinant of Doppler pulmonary venous flow parameters in healthy subjects, showing the strongest correlation with the systolic/diastolic peak velocity ratio (r = 0.73).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12648c1292a1e50c34d05fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper