Key result
Automated ECGtizer outperforms existing methods in signal recovery and AI classification for digitizing paper ECGs.
Why the study?
Traditional paper-based ECG storage challenges automated analyses, and accessible, fully automated tools for digitizing paper ECGs at scale are lacking.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ECGtizer provides a fully automated, open-source solution for high-fidelity digitization of paper ECGs, outperforming existing methods and enabling the use of historical ECG data for modern AI-driven analysis.
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential for diagnosing cardiac pathologies, yet traditional paper-based ECG storage poses significant challenges for automated analyses. Despite the growing interest in leveraging AI for ECG analysis, there remains a lack of accessible, fully automated tools for digitizing paper-based ECGs. Existing solutions are often incomplete, behind paywalls, or not suited for large-scale use. To address this gap, we present ECGtizer : an open-source, fully automated tool that enables high-fidelity digitization of paper ECGs, ensuring long-term preservation of clinical data and unlocking their potential for modern AI-driven analysis. ECGtizer employs automated lead detection, three different pixel-based signal extraction algorithms, and a deep learning-based signal reconstruction module. We evaluated ECGtizer on two datasets: a real-life cohort from the COVID-19 pandemic (JOCOVID) and a publicly available dataset (PTB-XL). Performance was compared with two existing methods: the fully automated ECGminer and the semi-automated PaperECG , which requires human intervention. The tools’ digitization performance was assessed in terms of signal recovery, the fidelity of clinically relevant feature measurement and downstream AI classification tasks on a third dataset (GENEREPOL). Results show that ECGtizer outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with its ECGtizer Frag algorithm delivering superior signal recovery performance. While PaperECG demonstrated better outcomes than ECGminer , it also requires human input. ECGtizer enhances the usability of historical ECG data and supports advanced AI-based diagnostic methods, making it a valuable addition to the field of AI in ECG analysis. • Introduced ECGtizer, an open source and fully automated tool to digitize paper ECGs. • ECGtizer outperforms current methods in signal recovery. • Tested on real-world and public datasets. • Supports advanced AI diagnostic methods. • Opens new research avenues by allowing the use of ECG historical data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lence et al. (2025) studied this question. ECGtizer vs. ECGminer and PaperECG was evaluated on Signal recovery, fidelity of clinically relevant feature measurement, and downstream AI classification tasks. The fully automated ECGtizer tool outperformed existing methods, including ECGminer and PaperECG, in signal recovery and downstream AI classification tasks for digitizing paper electrocardiograms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: