Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Relationships between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathologies in cognitively unimpaired adults and in vivo neurometabolic properties measured directly from the hippocampus, a vulnerable region early along the AD continuum, are not well-understood in the earliest stages of AD. In a 3T 1 H-MRS study, we assessed age and AD-related changes in estimates of absolute concentrations of neurometabolites in the right hippocampus. Participants included older adults (age range: 60-85, n=19) primarily cognitively unimpaired (CU, n=16), as well as some with cognitive impairment (n=3). All participants previously received a lumbar puncture for AD disease staging from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers (Aβ42, p-tau181 and t-tau), where all were amyloid positive (A+) and most had subthreshold tau pathology (T-). Hippocampal 1 H-MRS metabolites included total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA), myo-inositol (mIns), total creatine (tCr) and total choline (tCho). Regression analyses were performed for assessing relationships among CSF biomarkers, age, and 1 H-MRS metabolites measured as tissue-corrected estimates of absolute concentrations (millimoles/kilogram) and as ratios (/tCr and tNAA/mIns). We identified age-related decreases to mIns/tCr, where estimated absolute concentrations revealed that tCr increased while mIns remained stable. Concentrations for tNAA and mIns were positively associated with CSF p-tau181 and t-tau. Levels of tCr and tCho were not associated with any CSF biomarkers. Overall, our results demonstrate that sub-threshold tau pathologies in cognitively unimpaired A+ individuals are associated with hippocampal metabolite changes related to neural metabolism and glial reactivity early in disease progression. • Aging increases hippocampal creatine suggesting neuroinflammation. • Tau links to MRS estimates of N-acetylaspartate and myo-inositol in A+ adults. • MRS may track neuroinflammation and neuronal dysfunction early in aging and AD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lingad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: