Key result
Ultrasonic tissue characterization has great potential to become a practical bedside diagnostic tool for distinguishing viable from nonviable myocardium during acute coronary syndromes.
Why the study?
Can ultrasonic tissue characterization effectively differentiate viable from nonviable myocardium in the acute setting?
Can ultrasonic tissue characterization effectively differentiate viable from nonviable myocardium in the acute setting?
Ultrasonic tissue characterization is highlighted as a promising, practical bedside tool for assessing myocardial viability in acute coronary syndromes.
Ultrasonic tissue characterization shows promise as a bedside viability tool in ACS; leaves open prospective validation against established modalities.
The determination of myocardial perfusion and myocardial viability has prognostic and therapeutic implications, particularly in the current era of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. Several modes of investigation, including positron emission tomography, thallium-201 scintigraphy, and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging are used to differentiate viable from nonviable myocardium. Though these noninvasive tests are useful diagnostic modalities, they are expensive, time consuming, and too cumbersome to be used in the acute setting. Expeditious distinction between viable and nonviable myocardium, during acute coronary syndromes, is of great importance since reperfusion can minimize the extent of ischemic injury and infarction. An expanding body of evidence confirms that ultrasonic tissue characterization has great potential to become a practical bedside diagnostic tool in the search for salvageable myocardium. Further clinical investigative studies would help accomplish a better understanding of the complex interaction between ultrasound and myocardium. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 13, July 1996)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schecter et al. (1996) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndromes and myocardial viability. Ultrasonic tissue characterization vs. Positron emission tomography, thallium-201 scintigraphy, and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated. Ultrasonic tissue characterization has great potential to become a practical bedside diagnostic tool for distinguishing viable from nonviable myocardium during acute coronary syndromes.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: