Key result
Inappropriate DVT prophylaxis occurs in ~21% of medical patients, linked to ICU and prolonged stays.
Why the study?
A significant number of hospitalized patients at risk of thromboembolism do not receive prophylaxis despite established standards, prompting an evaluation of DVT prophylaxis appropriateness.
What is the appropriateness of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis use among patients admitted to a medical ward in Northwest Ethiopia?
Observational (n=365)
No
What is the appropriateness of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis use among patients admitted to a medical ward in Northwest Ethiopia?
A significant proportion (21.37%) of medical ward patients received inappropriate DVT prophylaxis, highlighting the need for integrated risk stratification checklists.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant local audits for high-risk medical inpatients; leaves open whether checklists improve prophylaxis appropriateness.
Background During hospitalization, a significant number of patients at risk of thromboembolism do not receive prophylaxis, despite established standards and viable procedures for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of vein thrombosis prophylaxis use among patients admitted to the medical ward of Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DTCSH) in Northwest Ethiopia. Methods An observational follow-up study was conducted in the medical wards of Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia to determine whether thromboprophylaxis was appropriately used, based on the Padua risk assessment tool. To identify factors associated with the occurrence of inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use, a binary logistic regression model was used. Statistical significance was considered when the p -value was <0.05, with a 95% confidence interval. Results Among the 365 patients in the study, 21.37% received inappropriate thromboprophylaxis, while 78.63% received it correctly. Patients admitted to the ICU [AOR = 4.276, 95% CI: 1.878–16.134; p = 0.000], those who stayed for more than 6 days [AOR =6.192, 95% CI: 2.085–14.391; p = 0.000], and general practitioners [AOR = 1.816, 95% CI: 1.007–3.207; p = 0.048] were more likely to receive inappropriate thrombophylaxis. Conclusion The appropriateness of DVT prophylaxis use was suboptimal, especially among the patients treated by general practitioners, those hospitalized in the intensive care unit, and those who stayed for more than a few days in the ward. Using an integrated risk stratification checklist is an effective way to promote the more rational use of DVT prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dagnew et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Deep vein thrombosis risk in hospitalized medical patients (n=365). Pharmacological DVT prophylaxis was evaluated on Inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use. Inappropriate deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis occurred in 21.37% of medical ward patients, with ICU admission (AOR 4.276) and stays over 6 days (AOR 6.192) significantly increasing the risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: