Key result
Principal-position inpatient administrative diagnosis codes for acute venous thromboembolism demonstrated a positive predictive value of 90%, while position-unspecified diagnoses had a PPV of 26%.
Why the study?
What is the positive predictive value of ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute VTE compared to physician-adjudicated chart review?
Observational (n=75)
Yes
What is the positive predictive value of ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute VTE compared to physician-adjudicated chart review?
Principal and secondary ICD-9-CM discharge diagnoses for VTE have high positive predictive values (90% and 80%, respectively), whereas position-unspecified diagnoses are less reliable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Principal-position codes support VTE identification in administrative data; extends validation efforts but leaves open reliability of unspecified codes.
The Sentinel Distributed Database (SDD) is a database of patient administrative healthcare records, derived from insurance claims and electronic health records, sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration for evaluation of medical product outcomes. There is limited information on the validity of diagnosis codes for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the SDD and administrative healthcare data more generally.In this chart validation study, we report on the positive predictive value (PPV) of inpatient administrative diagnosis codes for acute VTE-pulmonary embolism (PE) or lower-extremity or site-unspecified deep vein thrombosis (DVT)-within the SDD. As part of an assessment of thromboembolic adverse event risk following treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IGIV), charts were obtained for 75 potential VTE cases, abstracted, and physician-adjudicated.VTE status was determined for 62 potential cases. PPVs for lower-extremity DVT and/or PE were 90% (95% CI: 73-98%) for principal-position diagnoses, 80% (95% CI: 28-99%) for secondary diagnoses, and 26% (95% CI: 11-46%) for position-unspecified diagnoses (originating from physician claims associated with an inpatient stay). Average symptom onset was 1.5 days prior to hospital admission (range: 19 days prior to 4 days after admission).PPVs for principal and secondary VTE discharge diagnoses were similar to prior study estimates. Position-unspecified diagnoses were less likely to represent true acute VTE cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammann et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (n=75). Inpatient administrative diagnosis codes for acute VTE vs. Physician-adjudicated medical charts was evaluated on Positive predictive value (PPV) of principal-position inpatient diagnoses for acute VTE (95% CI 73-98). Principal-position inpatient administrative diagnosis codes for acute venous thromboembolism demonstrated a positive predictive value of 90%, while position-unspecified diagnoses had a PPV of 26%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: