Key result
Systolic dysfunction after first MI fully resolves in ~23% of patients.
Why the study?
Left ventricular ejection fraction independently predicts adverse outcomes after myocardial infarction, but current data on its trajectories and determinants are scarce.
What are the trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery after a first myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=1,065)
No
What are the trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery after a first myocardial infarction?
Despite modern primary PCI, over 20% of first-time MI patients have an EF <40% at discharge, though approximately half will experience EF improvement during follow-up.
Serial EF monitoring after first MI may identify recovery; leaves open determinants and targeted interventions.
Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). However, current data on trajectories and determinants of EF are scarce. The present study aimed to describe the epidemiology of EF after MI. Methods: Data from a single-center prospectively-designed registry of consecutive patients hospitalized at a large tertiary cardiology center were utilized. Results: Out of 1,593 patients in the registry, 1,065 were hospitalized for MI type I (65.4% STEMI) and had no previous history of heart failure or MI. At discharge, EF < 40% was present in 238 (22.3%), EF 40-50% in 326 (30.6%) and EF > 50% in 501 (47.0%). Patients with EF < 40% were often those who suffered subacute and anterior STEMI, had higher heart rate at admission and higher maximal troponin level, and had more often HF signs requiring intravenous diuretics. Among subjects with EF < 40%, the follow-up EF was available in 166 (80% of eligible). Systolic function recovered to EF > 50% in 39 (23.1%), slightly improved to EF 40-50% in 44 (26.0%) and remained below 40% in 86 (50.9%). Systolic function improvement to EF > 40% was predicted by lower severity of coronary atherosclerosis, lower leukocyte count, and the absence of atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: Despite recent improvements in in-hospital MI care, one in five patients has systolic dysfunction at hospital discharge. Out of these, EF improves in 51%, and full recovery is observed in 23%. The severity of coronary atherosclerosis, inflammatory response to MI, and atrial fibrillation may affect EF recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wohlfahrt et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in First myocardial infarction (n=1,065). Standard of care (Observational) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction recovery. In patients hospitalized for their first myocardial infarction, 22.3% had systolic dysfunction (EF < 40%) at discharge, of which 23.1% fully recovered to EF > 50% during follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: