Key result
Digital health interventions for major trauma rehabilitation await evaluation in this pending systematic review protocol.
Why the study?
Patients with major trauma often need long-term access to health care, but existing evidence on the effectiveness of digital health interventions for improving their health-related outcomes needs exploration.
Do remote digital health interventions improve physical, functional, or psychological rehabilitation outcomes in adult patients with major traumatic injuries?
Systematic Review
Do remote digital health interventions improve physical, functional, or psychological rehabilitation outcomes in adult patients with major traumatic injuries?
This protocol outlines a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of remote digital health interventions for the rehabilitation of adult patients following major physical trauma.
No immediate change to post-trauma rehabilitation practice; this protocol will synthesize evidence on digital health interventions to guide future research.
BACKGROUND The use of digital health (DH) interventions has increased over the past 2 decades, providing patients with alternative remote pathways for receiving health care services. Patients with major trauma frequently require long-term access to health care services to support their mental and physical health and their overall quality of life. DH interventions can help patients stay connected to rehabilitation services, thereby enhancing their health condition and helping them regain their independence, which will enable them to return to the workplace or regain a role in society. There is a need to explore existing evidence on the effectiveness of DH interventions for improving health-related outcomes in patients with major trauma. OBJECTIVE This review aims to identify DH interventions that support the physical, functional, or psychological rehabilitation of patients who have experienced major physical trauma. METHODS This review targets randomized controlled trials. Studies investigating DH interventions in adult patients with major traumatic physical injuries (end users of the interventions) are considered eligible for inclusion. Digital interventions that are delivered remotely and studies that report the impact of DH interventions on patients’ health-related outcomes will be included. The search will be limited to publications since 2000 and peer-reviewed journals. No language restrictions will be applied, and articles not written in English will be translated. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL Plus, and PsycInfo. Grey literature and bibliographies of included studies and relevant reviews will also be searched for potentially relevant articles. A minimum of two reviewers will independently screen retrieved references. Data extraction will be conducted by 1 reviewer and independently checked by another reviewer. Quality assessment of the included studies will be conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Any disagreements arising at any stage of the review will be resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer, if required. A meta-analysis will be performed where possible, and a descriptive analysis of the included studies will be reported. RESULTS As of January 2025, the systematic review is in the data extraction stage. Seven studies have been identified as eligible for inclusion. The findings are expected to be published in a peer-reviewed journal by December 2025. CONCLUSIONS The review findings will help identify existing evidence regarding DH interventions used to support the physical, functional, or psychological rehabilitation needs of patients with major trauma. This would help guide practitioners and policy makers to implement effective interventions to better support patient outcomes. The evidence synthesized from this review will also identify existing gaps and direct future research. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42023485748; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023485748 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/67675
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Jabr et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Major traumatic physical injuries. Digital health interventions vs. Control group was evaluated on Patient health-related outcomes (physical, psychological or emotional). Digital health interventions for the physical and mental rehabilitation of adult patients following major traumatic injuries are the focus of this systematic review protocol, with results pending.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: