Key result
Higher atherogenic index of plasma predicts ~143% greater clinical worsening risk in pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is used to assess various cardiovascular events, but its prognostic value in pulmonary hypertension (PH) required investigation.
Does the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) predict clinical worsening outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=125)
No
Does the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) predict clinical worsening outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Effect estimate: HR 2.426 (95% CI 1.021-5.763)
p-value: p=0.045
The atherogenic index of plasma is an independent predictor of long-term clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension, and its addition to clinical models significantly improves risk stratification.
Background The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a brand-new lipid parameter that has been used to assess various cardiovascular events. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of AIP in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods This retrospective study was conducted at Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine affiliated Renji Hospital, and included data from 125 PH patients treated during 2014–2018. The endpoint events of this study were clinical worsening outcomes. PH patients include those from group 1 and group 4. AIP was determined as the logarithm of the blood triglycerides ratio to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year incidence rates of clinical worsening outcomes in PH patients in this study were 20.0, 44.8, and 54.4%, respectively. The median age of the PH patients was 38.00 years, with females accounting for 90.4%. After controlling for multivariable factors, the results of Cox regression analysis indicated that AIP was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes with a hazard ratio and 95% confident interval (CI) of 2.426 (1.021–5.763). The positive linear relationship of AIP was evaluated using restricted cubic spline analysis. Kaplan–Meier curves showed a significantly higher events rate in patients with AIP ≥ 0.144 compared to those with AIP < 0.144 ( p = 0.002). Four potential prognostic variables, including AIP, were identified by LASSO regression to construct a nomogram. Compared to the model minus AIP, the AUC of the nomogram displayed a non-significant improvement (0.749 vs. 0.788, p = 0.298). In contrast, the results of net reclassification improvement (0.306, 95% CI: 0.039–0.459, p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.049, 95% CI: 0.006–0.097, p = 0.020) demonstrated significant enhancements in the predictive ability of the model when AIP was added to the clinical model. Conclusion AIP is an independent predictor of long-term clinical worsening in PH patients, and its inclusion in prognostic models could improve risk stratification and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=125). Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) was evaluated on Clinical worsening outcomes (lung transplantation, rehospitalization, all-cause death) (HR 2.426, 95% CI 1.021-5.763, p=0.045). Atherogenic index of plasma was an independent predictor of long-term clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension, with a hazard ratio of 2.426.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: