PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1996Circulation235 citations

Site-Dependent Intra-Atrial Conduction Delay

View Full Paper
PPPanos C. PapageorgiouKMKevin M. MonahanNBNoel G. Boyle

Structured PICO

Does programmed stimulation from the HRA compared to the CS reveal site-specific intra-atrial conduction delays that explain AF initiation?

P
Population
17 patients without a history of atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation (AF), or structural heart disease, mean age 49 +/- 22 years.
I
Intervention
Programmed stimulation from the high right atrium (HRA)
C
Comparator
Programmed stimulation from the distal coronary sinus (CS)
O
Outcome
Intra-atrial conduction delays, relative refractoriness, and AF inducibilitysurrogate

Site-dependent intra-atrial conduction delays and dispersion of refractoriness are common, but nonuniform anisotropic characteristics of the posterior triangle of Koch may be critical for AF induction.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial dysrhythmia patients have exaggerated intra-atrial conduction delays and prolonged relative refractoriness in response to atrial premature depolarizations (APDs). Furthermore, atrial fibrillation (AF) is more readily inducible by APDs from the high right atrium (HRA) than the coronary sinus (CS). In this study, we postulated that site-specific intra-atrial conduction delays can explain why AF is initiated more from the HRA than from the CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 17 patients (age, 49 +/- 22 years) without a history of atrial flutter, AF, or structural heart disease. Programmed stimulation was carried out from the HRA and distal CS, and bipolar recordings were made at the HRA, His bundle, posterior triangle of Koch, and CS. More prolongations in conduction and relative refractoriness in all intra-atrial sites were observed during HRA than CS APDs. AF was induced in 8 patients after HRA and not CS stimulation. During HRA stimulation, patients with AF inducibility exhibited significant prolongation of conduction to the posterior triangle of Koch and marked broadening of the posterior triangle of Koch electrogram compared with CS stimulation. In patients without AF inducibility, the posterior triangle of Koch electrogram width was the same during HRA and CS stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of site-dependent intra-atrial conduction delays and site-dependent dispersion of refractoriness appears to be a common property of the atrial myocardium and does not necessarily forecast AF inducibility. However, the presence of nonuniform anisotropic characteristics of the posterior triangle of Koch may be critical for AF induction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Papageorgiou et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a128ed4f7bd4f5c7da68769https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.3.384
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper