Key result
Catheter ablation for VT in dilated-phase HCM yields ~55% recurrence, though ATP is usually sufficient.
Why the study?
The characteristics of the arrhythmogenic substrate and catheter ablation outcomes for ventricular tachycardia in dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were not fully illustrated.
Does catheter ablation prevent VT recurrence in patients with dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=13)
Does catheter ablation prevent VT recurrence in patients with dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Catheter ablation of VT in dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is challenging due to basal anteroseptal epicardial/intramural substrates, often requiring multiple sites or adjunctive techniques, with a 55% recurrence rate.
VT recurrence remains frequent after ablation in dilated-phase HCM; leaves open need for refined epicardial targeting in larger studies.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation is a therapeutic option to suppress ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the setting of dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (DHCM). However, the characteristics of the arrhythmogenic substrate and the ablation outcome are not fully illustrated. METHOD: ) were performed. The distribution of VT substrate as endocardial or epicardial/intramural was based on detailed mapping and ablation response during VT. RESULT: Two patients underwent ablation of sustained monomorphic VT that was not scar-mediated tachycardia. Of the remaining 11 patients, eight (73%) patients had VT substrate in the basal regions, most frequently at the epicardial and/or intramural basal antero-septum. None of the patients had VT substrate located at the LV inferolateral region. Ablation at the right ventricular septum and the aortic cusps was done in four and five patients, respectively. Other approaches including bipolar and chemical ablations, were done in three and two patients, respectively. Six (55%) out of 11 patients (two patients lost follow-up) had VT recurrence. All the six patients had basal substrate. However, anti-tachycardia pacing was sufficient for VT termination except in one patient. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of VT in patients with DHCM is challenging because of the predominant basal anteroseptal epicardial/intramural location of arrhythmogenic substrate. An ablation approach from multiple sites and/or adjunctive interventional techniques are often required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naeemah et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia in dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=13). Catheter ablation was evaluated on VT recurrence. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy resulted in VT recurrence in 55% of patients, though anti-tachycardia pacing was usually sufficient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: