Randomized trial shows AI predicts breast cancer mutations in a clinical cohort, indicating a new triaging tool.
Background: Breast cancer(BC) remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide.Early identification of high-risk genetic mutations, particularly BRCA1/2, is critical for therapeutic decision-making and risk-reduction strategies.However, access to genetic testing is limited in resource-constrained settings due to cost and logistical barriers.We aim to develop a non-invasive, AIbased approach to predict breast cancer-associated genetic mutations using digital mammography (DM). Methods:We developed an AI-driven framework using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), pre-trained on the Mini-DDSM dataset to learn foundational imaging features and subsequently fine-tuned on a single-center clinical cohort of 100 breast cancer patients (50 with pathogenic mutations and 50 with negative genetic testing).Multiple deep learning architectures (DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, and custom CNN) were evaluated.Ensemble strategies (stacking and weighted averaging) were employed to improve predictive performance.Explainability was assessed using class activation mapping (CAM)-based techniques, and predictive uncertainty quantified using Monte Carlo dropout.Results: DenseNet-121 achieved the highest individual model accuracy (73.9%).Ensembles further improved performance, with stacking achieving 78.4% accuracy and weighted averaging demonstrating the best generalizability (accuracy 82.6%, F1score 0.83).Explainability analyses consistently highlighted clinically relevant mammographic regions.Genotype-phenotype correlations were observed: nonmutated patients mostly exhibited luminal tumors, BRCA1 carriers were younger with high-grade triple-negative disease, and BRCA2/non-BRCA mutation carriers largely demonstrated intermediate-grade luminal type BC. Conclusions:This study demonstrates the feasibility of using AI-based analysis of DM to identify mutation-associated imaging patterns in BC.While not a substitute for genetic testing, this approach may serve as a cost-effective, non-invasive triaging tool to prioritize patients for genetic evaluation, in settings with limited access to molecular testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakasa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: