Cross-sectional evaluation finds students favor VR for sterile pharmaceutical manufacturing training, suggesting potential site visit replacement.
INTRODUCTION: Use of virtual reality (VR) is increasing in education. A VR and simulation field trip was developed, allowing students to experience a walkthrough of a sterile pharmaceutical manufacture site using three modalities: a VR headset with 3D static tour, 2D static desktop tour and a 360° dynamic video tour. This study aims to understand student opinions, assess usability of the modalities used and investigate potential for a simulation to replace physical site visits. METHODS: Data from undergraduate pharmacy and postgraduate pharmaceutical science students was gathered through an online survey. A system usability scale (SUS) score was calculated for each modality. Responses were coded and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and open-text responses were analysed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Data was collected from 82.3% (n = 79) of students who participated in the virtual field trip. Most students (97.4%, n = 76) across both courses were either extremely satisfied or satisfied with the session. Almost two thirds of students (64.9%, n = 50) ranked VR walkthrough highest, followed by 360° video walkthrough (19.5%, n = 15) and desktop walkthrough (15.6%, n = 12). Two out of three students (66.7%, n = 12) with previous on-site experience agreed the virtual field trip could replace a physical site visit. Open-text responses revealed advantages and drawbacks versus physical visits. All modalities displayed acceptable usability. Most students (91.0%, n = 71) would welcome wider use of VR and simulation in their course. CONCLUSION: Positive results obtained highlight potential for greater implementation of VR and simulation to support teaching of sterile manufacturing and increase student accessibility to manufacturing sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett-Lenane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: