Why the study?
Does using variable velocity encoding during the RR interval improve the accuracy and precision of ascending aorta flow measurements compared to constant velocity encoding?
Does using variable velocity encoding during the RR interval improve the accuracy and precision of ascending aorta flow measurements compared to constant velocity encoding?
Using variable velocity encoding during the RR interval improves the accuracy and precision of ascending aorta flow measurements in phase-contrast MRI.
Variable encoding may refine aortic flow quantification in practice; leaves open clinical outcome validation in larger trials.
Velocity-encoded phase imaging using asynchronous gating requires input of a velocity encoding value to set the velocity sensitivity of the pulse sequence. The raw data interpolation and reconstruction scheme that the pulse sequence uses forces the encoding value to be constant throughout the RR interval. The sequence and the raw data interpolation scheme were modified to allow two velocity encodings during the RR interval. Two-hundred cm/s encoding was used in systole, and 30 cm/s in diastole. Changing the encoding in diastole significantly improved the accuracy and precision of ascending aorta flow measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael H. Buonocore (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: