Key result
AI applications achieve up to ~97% accuracy for hypertension risk prediction in LMICs.
Why the study?
Hypertension disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, and this review aimed to identify current research, innovations, and developments in applying AI-based tools for hypertension prediction and risk assessment specifically in these settings.
Do artificial intelligence-based tools accurately predict and assess the risk of hypertension in low- and middle-income countries?
Do artificial intelligence-based tools accurately predict and assess the risk of hypertension in low- and middle-income countries?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI-based tools demonstrate high accuracy (78-97%) for hypertension risk prediction in LMICs, highlighting their potential to enhance disease prevention and management in resource-limited settings.
Objective According to the WHO, as of 2025, 1.4 billion adults between the ages 30–79 were living with hypertension, with approximately two-thirds of that number from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). By 2025, the number of individuals with hypertension is expected to have reached 1.5 billion, with sub-Saharan Africa alone projected to have 74.7 million cases. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated the potential to improve the accuracy of risk assessment tools for predicting, managing and diagnosing diseases before they escalate. This paper aims to conduct a scoping review to identify current research, innovations and developments in the application of AI-based tools for hypertension prediction and risk assessment, specifically in LMICs. Design This scoping review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to ensure proper representation and organisation of the literature. A search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Scopus, IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library. Two independent reviewers used the search terms in Appendix A to identify relevant literature. Initial scans were followed by a detailed evaluation based on well-structured and clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. A third, more experienced reviewer resolved any selection discrepancies flagged from the first two reviews. Data sources The literature that would be included within this study will primarily be sourced from the following scientific literature repositories: PubMed, Scopus, Elsevier, Google Scholar, IEEE and ACM Digital Library. Eligibility criteria The inclusion and exclusion criteria defined and used to guide the literature selection process within this review included the following: The literature should primarily be about the study of the deployment of AI algorithms or tools in the diagnosis, detection or risk assessment of hypertension in an LMIC. The data used in the literature to train and assess any implemented AI algorithms should be obtained from either an LMIC. The literature should have been published within the last 10 years, that is, 2014–2025. Data extraction and synthesis The scoping review process followed the steps first outlined by Arksey and O’Malley in 2005. These steps are: Identifying the research question. Identifying the relevant studies within the literature. Selecting the studies within the relevant studies that most align with the research question. Charting the data that is present within these selected studies to get a deeper understanding of them. Collating, summarising and reporting the information found in the selected literature. From an initial result of 1371 papers, 5 were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies solely focused on AI-based risk assessment and prediction of hypertension in LMICs. Results The review identified significant research on AI applications for hypertension risk assessment and prediction in LMICs. Notable studies include an Ethiopian study on using machine learning algorithms, achieving an accuracy of 88.81%, precision of 89.62% and recall of 97.04% in hypertension risk prediction. Another research study involving hypertensive patients from South Asian countries (Bangladesh, Nepal, India) employed non-invasive information and machine learning tools for accurate hypertension prediction. The reported prediction accuracy of the studies found ranged from 78% to 97% depending on dataset size and AI model used. Algorithms discussed in these papers include logistic regression, decision trees and naïve Bayes. Conclusions The reviewed studies highlight the promising potential of AI to enhance hypertension prevention and management in LMICs. Successful implementation of AI tools requires the development of locally contextualised models and the availability of validated local data. AI can significantly impact hypertension outcomes in LMICs, provided these conditions are met.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasu et al. (2026) conducted a review in Hypertension (n=5). Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms was evaluated on Prediction accuracy of AI models. Artificial intelligence applications for hypertension risk assessment and prediction in low- and middle-income countries achieved prediction accuracies ranging from 78% to 97%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: