Why the study?
Does short term anticoagulant treatment improve long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does short term anticoagulant treatment improve long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short-term anticoagulant treatment for acute myocardial infarction provides no long-term survival benefit at 20 years, emphasizing the critical need for ongoing secondary prevention.
A 20 year follow up of 1330 patients in the Medical Research Council trial of short term anticoagulant treatment in myocardial infarction showed no long term benefits; but it provided interesting data on the outcome in such patients. Sixteen per cent of the patients were alive 20 years later. The excess mortality rate in trial participants over that expected for England and Wales as a whole declined rapidly after the early months, but some excess persisted throughout the follow up. Three quarters of all the deaths were from coronary heart disease; 70% of these coronary deaths occurred after the patients had left hospital. This finding emphasises the importance of secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: