New interpretation reveals Argentarius's erotic view of 'serious' poetry, highlighting contrast with Hesiod.
Anth. Pal . 9.161, in which Pyrrha interrupts Argentarius’ reading of Hesiod, is usually read as presenting a contrast between Argentarius’ erotic poetry and the serious Works and Days . Instead, I argue that the epigram characterizes Argentarius as an erotic reader, who finds even “serious” poems potentially arousing. Abstract: Anth. Pal . 9.161, dans laquelle Pyrrha interrompt la lecture d’Hésiode par Argentarius, est généralement interprétée comme une opposition entre la poésie érotique d’Argentarius et le sérieux Les Travaux et les Jours . Je soutiens plutôt que l’épigramme présente Argentarius comme un lecteur hédoniste qui trouve même les poèmes « sérieux » potentiellement excitants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leah Kronenberg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: